1898.HK vs. 0883.HK
Compare and contrast key facts about China Coal Energy (1898.HK) and CNOOC Ltd (0883.HK).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: 1898.HK or 0883.HK.
Key characteristics
| 1898.HK | 0883.HK | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 8.59% | 55.38% |
| 1Y Return | 25.75% | 83.88% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 29.43% | 53.23% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 24.16% | 19.30% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 9.76% | 12.70% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.79 | 3.03 |
| Daily Std Dev | 32.85% | 26.87% |
| Max Drawdown | -91.86% | -74.17% |
| Current Drawdown | -57.44% | -0.49% |
Fundamentals
| 1898.HK | 0883.HK | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | HK$144.11B | HK$974.15B |
| EPS | HK$1.53 | HK$1.39 |
| PE Ratio | 5.46 | 6.60 |
| PEG Ratio | 1.23 | 0.17 |
| Revenue (TTM) | HK$179.20B | HK$430.37B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | HK$41.72B | HK$201.49B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | HK$41.04B | HK$247.77B |
Correlation
The correlation between 1898.HK and 0883.HK is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
1898.HK vs. 0883.HK - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, 1898.HK achieves a 8.59% return, which is significantly lower than 0883.HK's 55.38% return. Over the past 10 years, 1898.HK has underperformed 0883.HK with an annualized return of 9.76%, while 0883.HK has yielded a comparatively higher 12.70% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
1898.HK vs. 0883.HK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for China Coal Energy (1898.HK) and CNOOC Ltd (0883.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
1898.HK vs. 0883.HK - Dividend Comparison
1898.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.90%, less than 0883.HK's 6.63% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1898.HK China Coal Energy | 5.90% | 6.41% | 5.55% | 3.58% | 5.97% | 2.87% | 2.17% | 1.26% | 0.00% | 1.02% | 2.10% | 6.03% |
0883.HK CNOOC Ltd | 6.63% | 10.31% | 18.84% | 6.85% | 9.05% | 5.63% | 4.96% | 3.83% | 3.81% | 7.06% | 5.46% | 3.95% |
Drawdowns
1898.HK vs. 0883.HK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 1898.HK drawdown since its inception was -91.86%, which is greater than 0883.HK's maximum drawdown of -74.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 1898.HK and 0883.HK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
1898.HK vs. 0883.HK - Volatility Comparison
China Coal Energy (1898.HK) has a higher volatility of 11.40% compared to CNOOC Ltd (0883.HK) at 9.18%. This indicates that 1898.HK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 0883.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
1898.HK vs. 0883.HK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between China Coal Energy and CNOOC Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities