PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
1171.HK vs. 1336.HK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

1171.HK vs. 1336.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in Yankuang Energy Group Co Ltd HK (1171.HK) and New China Life Insurance (1336.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 1171.HK achieves a 51.46% return, which is significantly higher than 1336.HK's -15.58% return. Over the past 10 years, 1171.HK has outperformed 1336.HK with an annualized return of 32.27%, while 1336.HK has yielded a comparatively lower 10.65% annualized return.


1171.HK

1D
3.11%
1M
3.77%
YTD
51.46%
6M
40.77%
1Y
91.73%
3Y*
14.58%
5Y*
36.26%
10Y*
32.27%

1336.HK

1D
-2.30%
1M
-12.28%
YTD
-15.58%
6M
1.95%
1Y
59.89%
3Y*
43.58%
5Y*
16.60%
10Y*
10.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

1171.HK vs. 1336.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
1171.HK
Yankuang Energy Group Co Ltd HK
51.46%17.12%-18.35%20.44%56.65%161.41%-2.20%39.96%-26.96%76.17%
1336.HK
New China Life Insurance
-15.58%146.51%68.38%-15.52%-0.67%-25.84%-6.00%10.32%-40.62%52.03%

Correlation

The correlation between 1171.HK and 1336.HK is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners. Combining low-correlation assets is one of the most reliable ways to reduce portfolio risk without sacrificing expected returns.


Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

1171.HK vs. 1336.HK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

1171.HK
1171.HK Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
1171.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
1171.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
1171.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
1171.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
1171.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

1336.HK
1336.HK Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
1336.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
1336.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
1336.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
1336.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
1336.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

1171.HK vs. 1336.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Yankuang Energy Group Co Ltd HK (1171.HK) and New China Life Insurance (1336.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


1171.HK1336.HKDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.44

1.23

+1.20

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.13

1.70

+1.43

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.23

+0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.41

2.48

+1.92

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.03

7.36

+3.68

1171.HK vs. 1336.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 1171.HK Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is higher than the 1336.HK Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 1171.HK and 1336.HK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


1171.HK1336.HKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.44

1.23

+1.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.40

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

0.28

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.20

+0.13

Drawdowns

1171.HK vs. 1336.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 1171.HK drawdown since its inception was -89.97%, which is greater than 1336.HK's maximum drawdown of -71.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 1171.HK and 1336.HK.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


1171.HK1336.HKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.97%

-71.90%

-18.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.20%

-30.22%

+12.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.27%

-52.81%

+2.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.48%

-71.90%

+15.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.33%

-29.58%

+16.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.16%

-35.05%

-5.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.27%

10.19%

-2.92%

Volatility

1171.HK vs. 1336.HK - Volatility Comparison

Yankuang Energy Group Co Ltd HK (1171.HK) has a higher volatility of 15.27% compared to New China Life Insurance (1336.HK) at 12.09%. This indicates that 1171.HK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 1336.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


1171.HK1336.HKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.27%

12.09%

+3.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.53%

29.53%

-3.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.15%

43.71%

-5.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.46%

42.47%

+6.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.34%

39.51%

+6.83%

Dividends

1171.HK vs. 1336.HK - Dividend Comparison

1171.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.39%, less than 1336.HK's 6.35% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
1171.HK
Yankuang Energy Group Co Ltd HK
5.39%8.17%5.83%33.73%1.97%3.13%10.23%24.63%9.34%1.50%0.22%0.69%
1336.HK
New China Life Insurance
6.35%5.36%6.46%7.74%8.84%8.00%5.13%2.62%2.02%1.03%0.93%0.82%

Financials

1171.HK vs. 1336.HK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Yankuang Energy Group Co Ltd HK and New China Life Insurance. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in HKD except per share items