1171.HK vs. 1336.HK
Compare and contrast key facts about Yankuang Energy Group Co Ltd HK (1171.HK) and New China Life Insurance (1336.HK).
Performance
1171.HK vs. 1336.HK - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 1171.HK achieves a 51.46% return, which is significantly higher than 1336.HK's -15.58% return. Over the past 10 years, 1171.HK has outperformed 1336.HK with an annualized return of 32.27%, while 1336.HK has yielded a comparatively lower 10.65% annualized return.
1171.HK
- 1D
- 3.11%
- 1M
- 3.77%
- YTD
- 51.46%
- 6M
- 40.77%
- 1Y
- 91.73%
- 3Y*
- 14.58%
- 5Y*
- 36.26%
- 10Y*
- 32.27%
1336.HK
- 1D
- -2.30%
- 1M
- -12.28%
- YTD
- -15.58%
- 6M
- 1.95%
- 1Y
- 59.89%
- 3Y*
- 43.58%
- 5Y*
- 16.60%
- 10Y*
- 10.65%
1171.HK vs. 1336.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1171.HK Yankuang Energy Group Co Ltd HK | 51.46% | 17.12% | -18.35% | 20.44% | 56.65% | 161.41% | -2.20% | 39.96% | -26.96% | 76.17% |
1336.HK New China Life Insurance | -15.58% | 146.51% | 68.38% | -15.52% | -0.67% | -25.84% | -6.00% | 10.32% | -40.62% | 52.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between 1171.HK and 1336.HK is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners. Combining low-correlation assets is one of the most reliable ways to reduce portfolio risk without sacrificing expected returns.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
1171.HK vs. 1336.HK — Risk / Return Rank
1171.HK
1336.HK
1171.HK vs. 1336.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Yankuang Energy Group Co Ltd HK (1171.HK) and New China Life Insurance (1336.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 1171.HK | 1336.HK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.44 | 1.23 | +1.20 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.13 | 1.70 | +1.43 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.23 | +0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.41 | 2.48 | +1.92 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.03 | 7.36 | +3.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 1171.HK | 1336.HK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.44 | 1.23 | +1.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | 0.40 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 | 0.28 | +0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.20 | +0.13 |
Drawdowns
1171.HK vs. 1336.HK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 1171.HK drawdown since its inception was -89.97%, which is greater than 1336.HK's maximum drawdown of -71.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 1171.HK and 1336.HK.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| 1171.HK | 1336.HK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.97% | -71.90% | -18.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.20% | -30.22% | +12.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.27% | -52.81% | +2.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.48% | -71.90% | +15.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.33% | -29.58% | +16.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.16% | -35.05% | -5.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.27% | 10.19% | -2.92% |
Volatility
1171.HK vs. 1336.HK - Volatility Comparison
Yankuang Energy Group Co Ltd HK (1171.HK) has a higher volatility of 15.27% compared to New China Life Insurance (1336.HK) at 12.09%. This indicates that 1171.HK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 1336.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| 1171.HK | 1336.HK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.27% | 12.09% | +3.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.53% | 29.53% | -3.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.15% | 43.71% | -5.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.46% | 42.47% | +6.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.34% | 39.51% | +6.83% |
Dividends
1171.HK vs. 1336.HK - Dividend Comparison
1171.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.39%, less than 1336.HK's 6.35% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1171.HK Yankuang Energy Group Co Ltd HK | 5.39% | 8.17% | 5.83% | 33.73% | 1.97% | 3.13% | 10.23% | 24.63% | 9.34% | 1.50% | 0.22% | 0.69% |
1336.HK New China Life Insurance | 6.35% | 5.36% | 6.46% | 7.74% | 8.84% | 8.00% | 5.13% | 2.62% | 2.02% | 1.03% | 0.93% | 0.82% |
Financials
1171.HK vs. 1336.HK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Yankuang Energy Group Co Ltd HK and New China Life Insurance. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities