1898.HK vs. ^GSPC
1898.HK (China Coal Energy) is a stock, while ^GSPC (S&P 500 Index) is an index. Over the past 10 years, 1898.HK returned 15.58%/yr vs 13.21%/yr for ^GSPC. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
1898.HK vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
1898.HK is traded in HKD, while ^GSPC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ^GSPC values have been converted to HKD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 1898.HK achieves a 11.36% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's 9.54% return. Over the past 10 years, 1898.HK has outperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 15.58%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively lower 13.21% annualized return.
1898.HK
- 1D
- 8.22%
- 1M
- 1.19%
- 6M
- 1.10%
- YTD
- 11.36%
- 1Y
- 21.12%
- 3Y*
- 30.34%
- 5Y*
- 24.75%
- 10Y*
- 15.58%
- ALL TIME*
- 0.51%
^GSPC
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -0.72%
- 6M
- 7.84%
- YTD
- 9.54%
- 1Y
- 18.11%
- 3Y*
- 18.06%
- 5Y*
- 11.49%
- 10Y*
- 13.21%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.15%
1898.HK vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1898.HK China Coal Energy | 11.36% | 12.63% | 43.71% | 20.54% | 48.33% | 99.49% | -18.77% | 3.14% | -10.94% | -2.93% |
^GSPC S&P 500 Index | 9.54% | 16.61% | 22.67% | 24.22% | -19.31% | 27.58% | 15.74% | 28.20% | -6.03% | 20.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between 1898.HK and ^GSPC is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2008 | 0.11 |
The correlation between 1898.HK and ^GSPC shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.11 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
1898.HK vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank
1898.HK
^GSPC
1898.HK vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for China Coal Energy (1898.HK) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| 1898.HK | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.26 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.64 | 2.07 | -1.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.74 | 8.96 | -7.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
1898.HK vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 1898.HK drawdown since its inception was -88.52%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 1898.HK and ^GSPC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 1898.HK | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.52% | -56.80% | -31.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.80% | -8.77% | -25.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.80% | -18.97% | -14.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.75% | -24.92% | -16.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.68% | -34.06% | -24.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.53% | -2.14% | -23.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -59.16% | -9.26% | -49.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.38% | 2.03% | +10.35% |
Volatility
1898.HK vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison
China Coal Energy (1898.HK) has a higher volatility of 13.42% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 3.14%. This indicates that 1898.HK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 1898.HK | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.42% | 3.14% | +10.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.92% | 10.04% | +19.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.24% | 12.61% | +26.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.86% | 16.97% | +24.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.39% | 18.03% | +19.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
1898.HK and ^GSPC have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for 1898.HK and ^GSPC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer