PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
0HIT.L vs. NEE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

0HIT.L vs. NEE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Iberdrola (0HIT.L) and NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

0HIT.L is traded in EUR, while NEE is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the NEE values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 0HIT.L achieves a 5.43% return, which is significantly lower than NEE's 10.57% return. Over the past 10 years, 0HIT.L has outperformed NEE with an annualized return of 16.03%, while NEE has yielded a comparatively lower 13.69% annualized return.


0HIT.L

1D
-1.28%
1M
-2.51%
YTD
5.43%
6M
8.91%
1Y
24.75%
3Y*
22.79%
5Y*
16.68%
10Y*
16.03%

NEE

1D
1.73%
1M
-7.56%
YTD
10.57%
6M
5.82%
1Y
22.71%
3Y*
5.86%
5Y*
7.40%
10Y*
13.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

0HIT.L vs. NEE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
0HIT.L
Iberdrola
5.43%44.01%15.99%12.81%8.81%-8.42%31.77%35.84%12.61%6.70%
NEE
NextEra Energy, Inc.
10.57%1.77%29.48%-27.54%-2.88%32.62%19.34%45.91%19.67%17.88%

Correlation

The correlation between 0HIT.L and NEE is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2007

0.18

Fundamentals

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

0HIT.L vs. NEE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

0HIT.L
0HIT.L Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
0HIT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
0HIT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
0HIT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
0HIT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
0HIT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

NEE
NEE Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
NEE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEE Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
NEE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEE Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

0HIT.L vs. NEE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Iberdrola (0HIT.L) and NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


0HIT.LNEEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.18

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.00

1.65

+0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.22

4.71

+2.50

0HIT.L vs. NEE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 0HIT.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is comparable to the NEE Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 0HIT.L and NEE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


0HIT.LNEEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

0.95

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.28

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.53

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.58

-0.27

Drawdowns

0HIT.L vs. NEE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 0HIT.L drawdown since its inception was -72.74%, which is greater than NEE's maximum drawdown of -47.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 0HIT.L and NEE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


0HIT.LNEEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.74%

-47.01%

-25.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.43%

-13.80%

+1.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.95%

-32.34%

+16.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.47%

-47.01%

+27.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.38%

-47.01%

+18.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.37%

-10.02%

+4.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.36%

-10.10%

-15.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.45%

4.83%

-1.38%

Volatility

0HIT.L vs. NEE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Iberdrola (0HIT.L) is 5.94%, while NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE) has a volatility of 8.86%. This indicates that 0HIT.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NEE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


0HIT.LNEEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.94%

8.86%

-2.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.11%

16.79%

+15.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.39%

24.03%

+10.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.44%

26.74%

-3.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.08%

25.71%

+1.37%

Dividends

0HIT.L vs. NEE - Dividend Comparison

0HIT.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.80%, more than NEE's 2.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
0HIT.L
Iberdrola
2.80%2.82%3.40%3.41%3.34%3.28%2.76%3.09%3.77%2.06%2.05%0.37%
NEE
NextEra Energy, Inc.
2.77%2.82%2.87%3.08%2.03%1.65%1.81%2.06%2.55%2.52%2.91%2.96%

Financials

0HIT.L vs. NEE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Iberdrola and NextEra Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00B8.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
6.70B
(0HIT.L) Total Revenue
(NEE) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. 0HIT.L values in EUR, NEE values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


0HIT.L and NEE have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 0HIT.L and NEE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer