PortfoliosLab logo
0HIT.L vs. RMS.PA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between 0HIT.L and RMS.PA is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

0HIT.L vs. RMS.PA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Iberdrola (0HIT.L) and Hermès International Société en commandite par actions (RMS.PA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%1,000.00%2,000.00%3,000.00%4,000.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
312.20%
3,885.51%
0HIT.L
RMS.PA

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

0HIT.L:

1.72

RMS.PA:

0.26

Sortino Ratio

0HIT.L:

2.27

RMS.PA:

0.62

Omega Ratio

0HIT.L:

1.29

RMS.PA:

1.08

Calmar Ratio

0HIT.L:

3.57

RMS.PA:

0.33

Martin Ratio

0HIT.L:

9.19

RMS.PA:

0.83

Ulcer Index

0HIT.L:

3.54%

RMS.PA:

9.80%

Daily Std Dev

0HIT.L:

19.53%

RMS.PA:

27.24%

Max Drawdown

0HIT.L:

-72.63%

RMS.PA:

-47.65%

Current Drawdown

0HIT.L:

-4.50%

RMS.PA:

-12.97%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

0HIT.L:

€61.14B

RMS.PA:

€258.63B

PS Ratio

0HIT.L:

0.00

RMS.PA:

16.94

PB Ratio

0HIT.L:

0.00

RMS.PA:

14.84

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 0HIT.L achieves a 16.61% return, which is significantly higher than RMS.PA's 6.40% return. Over the past 10 years, 0HIT.L has underperformed RMS.PA with an annualized return of 13.12%, while RMS.PA has yielded a comparatively higher 22.73% annualized return.


0HIT.L

YTD

16.61%

1M

5.96%

6M

18.28%

1Y

33.71%

5Y*

15.46%

10Y*

13.12%

RMS.PA

YTD

6.40%

1M

10.16%

6M

14.54%

1Y

7.19%

5Y*

29.61%

10Y*

22.73%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

0HIT.L vs. RMS.PA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

0HIT.L
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of 0HIT.L is 9292
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of 0HIT.L is 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of 0HIT.L is 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of 0HIT.L is 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of 0HIT.L is 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of 0HIT.L is 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

RMS.PA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RMS.PA is 6161
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RMS.PA is 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RMS.PA is 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RMS.PA is 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RMS.PA is 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RMS.PA is 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

0HIT.L vs. RMS.PA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Iberdrola (0HIT.L) and Hermès International Société en commandite par actions (RMS.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current 0HIT.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is higher than the RMS.PA Sharpe Ratio of 0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 0HIT.L and RMS.PA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.50December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
1.77
0.41
0HIT.L
RMS.PA

Dividends

0HIT.L vs. RMS.PA - Dividend Comparison

0HIT.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.08%, more than RMS.PA's 1.06% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
0HIT.L
Iberdrola
3.08%3.37%3.41%3.34%3.28%2.76%3.09%3.77%2.06%2.05%1.38%4.00%
RMS.PA
Hermès International Société en commandite par actions
1.06%1.08%0.68%0.55%0.30%0.52%0.68%1.34%0.84%0.86%2.09%0.92%

Drawdowns

0HIT.L vs. RMS.PA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 0HIT.L drawdown since its inception was -72.63%, which is greater than RMS.PA's maximum drawdown of -47.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 0HIT.L and RMS.PA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-5.20%
-6.88%
0HIT.L
RMS.PA

Volatility

0HIT.L vs. RMS.PA - Volatility Comparison

Iberdrola (0HIT.L) has a higher volatility of 11.17% compared to Hermès International Société en commandite par actions (RMS.PA) at 9.35%. This indicates that 0HIT.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RMS.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
11.17%
9.35%
0HIT.L
RMS.PA

Financials

0HIT.L vs. RMS.PA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Iberdrola and Hermès International Société en commandite par actions. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00BJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025
9.25B
7.67B
(0HIT.L) Total Revenue
(RMS.PA) Total Revenue
Values in EUR except per share items