0496.HK vs. ^IXIC
0496.HK (KASEN) is a stock, while ^IXIC (NASDAQ Composite) is an index. Over the past 10 years, 0496.HK returned -12.27%/yr vs 18.47%/yr for ^IXIC. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
0496.HK vs. ^IXIC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
0496.HK is traded in HKD, while ^IXIC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ^IXIC values have been converted to HKD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 0496.HK achieves a -32.53% return, which is significantly lower than ^IXIC's 16.20% return. Over the past 10 years, 0496.HK has underperformed ^IXIC with an annualized return of -12.27%, while ^IXIC has yielded a comparatively higher 18.47% annualized return.
0496.HK
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -8.20%
- YTD
- -32.53%
- 6M
- -36.36%
- 1Y
- -15.15%
- 3Y*
- -2.81%
- 5Y*
- -24.35%
- 10Y*
- -12.27%
^IXIC
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 3.82%
- YTD
- 16.20%
- 6M
- 14.53%
- 1Y
- 38.82%
- 3Y*
- 26.56%
- 5Y*
- 14.43%
- 10Y*
- 18.47%
0496.HK vs. ^IXIC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0496.HK KASEN | -32.53% | 20.29% | 16.95% | -32.95% | -42.86% | 5.48% | -80.00% | 5.19% | 178.41% | -2.96% |
^IXIC NASDAQ Composite | 16.20% | 20.59% | 27.98% | 43.41% | -32.99% | 22.05% | 42.99% | 34.51% | -3.67% | 29.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between 0496.HK and ^IXIC is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2007 | 0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
0496.HK vs. ^IXIC — Risk / Return Rank
0496.HK
^IXIC
0496.HK vs. ^IXIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KASEN (0496.HK) and NASDAQ Composite (^IXIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 0496.HK | ^IXIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.40 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.34 | 3.03 | -3.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.67 | 12.04 | -12.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 0496.HK | ^IXIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.29 | 2.33 | -2.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.40 | 0.65 | -1.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.18 | 0.84 | -1.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.15 | 0.58 | -0.73 |
Drawdowns
0496.HK vs. ^IXIC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 0496.HK drawdown since its inception was -97.21%, which is greater than ^IXIC's maximum drawdown of -55.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 0496.HK and ^IXIC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 0496.HK | ^IXIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.21% | -55.60% | -41.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -45.10% | -12.48% | -32.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.10% | -24.35% | -20.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -79.91% | -36.36% | -43.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -97.21% | -36.36% | -60.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.62% | -1.01% | -95.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.41% | -8.97% | -56.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.84% | 3.14% | +19.70% |
Volatility
0496.HK vs. ^IXIC - Volatility Comparison
KASEN (0496.HK) has a higher volatility of 13.65% compared to NASDAQ Composite (^IXIC) at 4.23%. This indicates that 0496.HK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^IXIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 0496.HK | ^IXIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.65% | 4.23% | +9.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.68% | 12.12% | +18.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.80% | 16.24% | +37.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 62.30% | 22.40% | +39.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 69.93% | 21.97% | +47.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
0496.HK and ^IXIC have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for 0496.HK and ^IXIC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer