PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
0386.HK vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

0386.HK vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in China Petroleum & Chemical Corp Class H (0386.HK) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

0386.HK is traded in HKD, while ^GSPC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ^GSPC values have been converted to HKD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 0386.HK achieves a -5.29% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 9.54% return. Over the past 10 years, 0386.HK has underperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 5.25%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively higher 13.21% annualized return.


0386.HK

1D
0.70%
1M
3.62%
6M
-10.65%
YTD
-5.29%
1Y
4.26%
3Y*
4.38%
5Y*
13.29%
10Y*
5.25%
ALL TIME*
8.46%

^GSPC

1D
-0.18%
1M
-0.72%
6M
7.84%
YTD
9.54%
1Y
18.11%
3Y*
18.06%
5Y*
11.49%
10Y*
13.21%
ALL TIME*
9.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

0386.HK vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
0386.HK
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp Class H
-5.29%11.35%17.14%17.25%19.85%13.41%-19.46%-8.73%6.53%9.78%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
9.54%16.61%22.67%24.22%-19.31%27.58%15.74%28.20%-6.03%20.34%

Correlation

The correlation between 0386.HK and ^GSPC is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2007

0.12

The correlation between 0386.HK and ^GSPC shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

0386.HK vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

0386.HK
0386.HK Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
0386.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
0386.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
0386.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
0386.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
0386.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

0386.HK vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for China Petroleum & Chemical Corp Class H (0386.HK) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


0386.HK^GSPCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.26

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.16

2.07

-1.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.32

8.96

-8.64

0386.HK vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 0386.HK Sharpe Ratio is 0.18, which is lower than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 0386.HK and ^GSPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

0386.HK vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 0386.HK drawdown since its inception was -71.01%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 0386.HK and ^GSPC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


0386.HK^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.01%

-56.80%

-14.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.14%

-8.77%

-18.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.76%

-18.97%

-11.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.76%

-24.92%

-5.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.60%

-34.06%

-21.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.86%

-2.14%

-19.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.68%

-9.26%

-16.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.60%

2.03%

+11.57%

Volatility

0386.HK vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

China Petroleum & Chemical Corp Class H (0386.HK) has a higher volatility of 5.89% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 3.14%. This indicates that 0386.HK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


0386.HK^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.89%

3.14%

+2.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.54%

10.04%

+8.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.57%

12.61%

+11.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.46%

16.97%

+8.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.39%

18.03%

+8.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


0386.HK and ^GSPC have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 0386.HK and ^GSPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer