PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
0386.HK vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


0386.HK^GSPC
YTD Return14.44%17.95%
1Y Return8.35%24.88%
3Y Return (Ann)14.81%8.21%
5Y Return (Ann)7.17%13.37%
10Y Return (Ann)2.85%10.92%
Sharpe Ratio0.142.03
Daily Std Dev27.71%12.77%
Max Drawdown-100.00%-56.78%
Current Drawdown-100.00%-0.73%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.1

The correlation between 0386.HK and ^GSPC is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

0386.HK vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, 0386.HK achieves a 14.44% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 17.95% return. Over the past 10 years, 0386.HK has underperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 2.85%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively higher 10.92% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


300.00%350.00%400.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
291.19%
405.97%
0386.HK
^GSPC

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

0386.HK vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for China Petroleum & Chemical Corp Class H (0386.HK) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


0386.HK
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for 0386.HK, currently valued at 0.23, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.000.23
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for 0386.HK, currently valued at 0.52, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.52
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for 0386.HK, currently valued at 1.13, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.13
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for 0386.HK, currently valued at 0.06, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.000.06
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for 0386.HK, currently valued at 0.92, compared to the broader market-10.00-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.000.92
^GSPC
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ^GSPC, currently valued at 2.42, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.002.42
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ^GSPC, currently valued at 3.23, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.003.23
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ^GSPC, currently valued at 1.24, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.24
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ^GSPC, currently valued at 2.13, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.002.13
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ^GSPC, currently valued at 14.63, compared to the broader market-10.00-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.0014.63

0386.HK vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 0386.HK Sharpe Ratio is 0.14, which is lower than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of 0386.HK and ^GSPC.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.503.00AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
0.23
2.42
0386.HK
^GSPC

Drawdowns

0386.HK vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 0386.HK drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 0386.HK and ^GSPC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-100.00%-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
-100.00%
-0.73%
0386.HK
^GSPC

Volatility

0386.HK vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

China Petroleum & Chemical Corp Class H (0386.HK) has a higher volatility of 11.55% compared to S&P 500 (^GSPC) at 4.09%. This indicates that 0386.HK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
11.55%
4.09%
0386.HK
^GSPC