PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
0386.HK vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

0386.HK vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in China Petroleum & Chemical Corp Class H (0386.HK) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

0386.HK is traded in HKD, while ^GSPC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ^GSPC values have been converted to HKD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 0386.HK achieves a -6.85% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 8.56% return. Over the past 10 years, 0386.HK has underperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 5.71%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively higher 13.43% annualized return.


0386.HK

1D
-0.46%
1M
-7.64%
YTD
-6.85%
6M
-3.97%
1Y
7.59%
3Y*
2.49%
5Y*
9.59%
10Y*
5.71%

^GSPC

1D
-2.65%
1M
0.23%
YTD
8.56%
6M
8.16%
1Y
24.13%
3Y*
19.85%
5Y*
12.01%
10Y*
13.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

0386.HK vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
0386.HK
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp Class H
-6.85%11.10%17.42%17.25%19.85%14.17%-19.50%-8.90%6.53%9.85%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
8.56%16.61%22.67%24.22%-19.31%27.58%15.74%28.20%-6.03%20.34%

Correlation

The correlation between 0386.HK and ^GSPC is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2007

0.12

The correlation between 0386.HK and ^GSPC shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

0386.HK vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

0386.HK
0386.HK Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
0386.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
0386.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
0386.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
0386.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
0386.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

0386.HK vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for China Petroleum & Chemical Corp Class H (0386.HK) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


0386.HK^GSPCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.36

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.34

2.76

-2.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.75

12.76

-12.02

0386.HK vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 0386.HK Sharpe Ratio is 0.34, which is lower than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 0386.HK and ^GSPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


0386.HK^GSPCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

1.99

-1.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.71

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

0.75

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.44

-0.18

Drawdowns

0386.HK vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 0386.HK drawdown since its inception was -71.92%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 0386.HK and ^GSPC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


0386.HK^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.92%

-56.80%

-15.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.67%

-8.77%

-14.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.76%

-18.97%

-11.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.76%

-24.92%

-5.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.68%

-34.06%

-21.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.14%

-3.01%

-20.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.64%

-9.28%

-19.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.67%

1.90%

+8.77%

Volatility

0386.HK vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

China Petroleum & Chemical Corp Class H (0386.HK) has a higher volatility of 4.44% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 3.83%. This indicates that 0386.HK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


0386.HK^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.44%

3.83%

+0.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.57%

9.41%

+9.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.73%

12.19%

+11.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.63%

16.92%

+8.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.50%

18.05%

+8.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


0386.HK and ^GSPC have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 0386.HK and ^GSPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer