0386.HK vs. MSFT
Compare and contrast key facts about China Petroleum & Chemical Corp Class H (0386.HK) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: 0386.HK or MSFT.
Key characteristics
0386.HK | MSFT | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 14.44% | 15.13% |
1Y Return | 8.35% | 28.08% |
3Y Return (Ann) | 14.81% | 13.83% |
5Y Return (Ann) | 7.17% | 26.89% |
10Y Return (Ann) | 2.85% | 26.89% |
Sharpe Ratio | 0.14 | 1.46 |
Daily Std Dev | 27.71% | 19.99% |
Max Drawdown | -100.00% | -69.41% |
Current Drawdown | -100.00% | -7.74% |
Fundamentals
0386.HK | MSFT | |
---|---|---|
Market Cap | HK$766.47B | $3.20T |
EPS | HK$0.53 | $11.79 |
PE Ratio | 8.06 | 36.52 |
PEG Ratio | 1.97 | 2.32 |
Total Revenue (TTM) | HK$3.13T | $245.12B |
Gross Profit (TTM) | HK$472.02B | $171.01B |
Correlation
The correlation between 0386.HK and MSFT is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
0386.HK vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with 0386.HK having a 14.44% return and MSFT slightly higher at 15.13%. Over the past 10 years, 0386.HK has underperformed MSFT with an annualized return of 2.85%, while MSFT has yielded a comparatively higher 26.89% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
0386.HK vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for China Petroleum & Chemical Corp Class H (0386.HK) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
0386.HK vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison
0386.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.72%, more than MSFT's 0.70% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp Class H | 8.72% | 9.16% | 14.50% | 9.62% | 8.29% | 9.32% | 12.09% | 5.44% | 2.98% | 5.31% | 4.84% | 3.71% |
Microsoft Corporation | 0.70% | 0.74% | 1.06% | 0.68% | 0.94% | 1.20% | 1.69% | 1.86% | 2.37% | 2.33% | 2.48% | 2.59% |
Drawdowns
0386.HK vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 0386.HK drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than MSFT's maximum drawdown of -69.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 0386.HK and MSFT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
0386.HK vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp Class H (0386.HK) has a higher volatility of 11.55% compared to Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) at 5.19%. This indicates that 0386.HK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
0386.HK vs. MSFT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between China Petroleum & Chemical Corp Class H and Microsoft Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities