0386.HK vs. MSFT

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about China Petroleum & Chemical Corp Class H (0386.HK) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT).

Performance

0386.HK vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in China Petroleum & Chemical Corp Class H (0386.HK) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0386.HK vs. MSFT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
0386.HK China Petroleum & Chemical Corp Class H	-1.93%	11.10%	17.42%	17.25%	19.85%	14.17%	-19.50%	-8.90%	6.53%	9.85%
MSFT Microsoft Corporation	-22.92%	15.81%	12.34%	58.17%	-27.90%	53.30%	41.89%	56.73%	21.06%	41.81%

Different Trading Currencies

0386.HK is traded in HKD, while MSFT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MSFT values have been converted to HKD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 0386.HK achieves a -1.93% return, which is significantly higher than MSFT's -22.92% return. Over the past 10 years, 0386.HK has underperformed MSFT with an annualized return of 7.03%, while MSFT has yielded a comparatively higher 22.54% annualized return.

0386.HK

• 1D: 2.00%
• 1M: -18.07%
• YTD: -1.93%
• 6M: 13.09%
• 1Y: 18.24%
• 3Y*: 6.82%
• 5Y*: 11.30%
• 10Y*: 7.03%

MSFT

• 1D: -0.25%
• 1M: -7.14%
• YTD: -22.92%
• 6M: -28.12%
• 1Y: -1.92%
• 3Y*: 9.40%
• 5Y*: 9.87%
• 10Y*: 22.54%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

0386.HK vs. MSFT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

0386.HK

0386.HK Risk / Return Rank: 61
0386.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
0386.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
0386.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 59
0386.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
0386.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 62

MSFT

MSFT Risk / Return Rank: 35
MSFT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
MSFT Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
MSFT Omega Ratio Rank: 30
MSFT Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
MSFT Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

0386.HK vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for China Petroleum & Chemical Corp Class H (0386.HK) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	0386.HK	MSFT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.76	-0.07	+0.83
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.12	0.08	+1.04
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.01	+0.15
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.81	-0.00	+0.81
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.31	-0.01	+2.32
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

0386.HK vs. MSFT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 0386.HK Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is higher than the MSFT Sharpe Ratio of -0.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 0386.HK and MSFT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	0386.HK	MSFT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76	-0.07	+0.83
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45	0.38	+0.07
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.27	0.84	-0.57
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.27	0.59	-0.33

Correlation

The correlation between 0386.HK and MSFT is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

0386.HK vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison

0386.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.44%, more than MSFT's 0.94% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
0386.HK China Petroleum & Chemical Corp Class H	5.44%	5.33%	8.50%	9.16%	14.50%	9.64%	8.25%	9.11%	12.09%	5.51%	2.96%	5.34%
MSFT Microsoft Corporation	0.94%	0.70%	0.73%	0.74%	1.06%	0.68%	0.94%	1.20%	1.69%	1.86%	2.37%	2.33%

Drawdowns

0386.HK vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 0386.HK drawdown since its inception was -71.92%, which is greater than MSFT's maximum drawdown of -57.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 0386.HK and MSFT.

Drawdown Indicators

	0386.HK	MSFT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.92%	-69.38%	-2.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.85%	-33.91%	+13.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.76%	-37.15%	+6.39%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-55.68%	-37.15%	-18.53%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-19.08%	-31.58%	+12.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.70%	-21.77%	-6.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.29%	12.61%	-5.32%

Volatility

0386.HK vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison

China Petroleum & Chemical Corp Class H (0386.HK) has a higher volatility of 8.21% compared to Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) at 6.29%. This indicates that 0386.HK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	0386.HK	MSFT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.21%	6.29%	+1.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.39%	19.06%	-0.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.64%	26.39%	-1.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.99%	26.14%	-0.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.60%	26.84%	-0.24%

Financials