PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
0386.HK vs. MSFT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


0386.HKMSFT
YTD Return14.44%15.13%
1Y Return8.35%28.08%
3Y Return (Ann)14.81%13.83%
5Y Return (Ann)7.17%26.89%
10Y Return (Ann)2.85%26.89%
Sharpe Ratio0.141.46
Daily Std Dev27.71%19.99%
Max Drawdown-100.00%-69.41%
Current Drawdown-100.00%-7.74%

Fundamentals


0386.HKMSFT
Market CapHK$766.47B$3.20T
EPSHK$0.53$11.79
PE Ratio8.0636.52
PEG Ratio1.972.32
Total Revenue (TTM)HK$3.13T$245.12B
Gross Profit (TTM)HK$472.02B$171.01B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.1

The correlation between 0386.HK and MSFT is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

0386.HK vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with 0386.HK having a 14.44% return and MSFT slightly higher at 15.13%. Over the past 10 years, 0386.HK has underperformed MSFT with an annualized return of 2.85%, while MSFT has yielded a comparatively higher 26.89% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


500.00%1,000.00%1,500.00%2,000.00%2,500.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
291.19%
2,427.83%
0386.HK
MSFT

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

0386.HK vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for China Petroleum & Chemical Corp Class H (0386.HK) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


0386.HK
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for 0386.HK, currently valued at 0.23, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.000.23
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for 0386.HK, currently valued at 0.52, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.52
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for 0386.HK, currently valued at 1.11, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.11
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for 0386.HK, currently valued at 0.06, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.000.06
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for 0386.HK, currently valued at 0.92, compared to the broader market-10.00-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.000.92
MSFT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MSFT, currently valued at 1.88, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.001.88
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for MSFT, currently valued at 2.44, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.44
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for MSFT, currently valued at 1.25, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.25
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for MSFT, currently valued at 2.38, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.002.38
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for MSFT, currently valued at 7.34, compared to the broader market-10.00-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.007.34

0386.HK vs. MSFT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 0386.HK Sharpe Ratio is 0.14, which is lower than the MSFT Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of 0386.HK and MSFT.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.50AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
0.23
1.88
0386.HK
MSFT

Dividends

0386.HK vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison

0386.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.72%, more than MSFT's 0.70% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
0386.HK
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp Class H
8.72%9.16%14.50%9.62%8.29%9.32%12.09%5.44%2.98%5.31%4.84%3.71%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
0.70%0.74%1.06%0.68%0.94%1.20%1.69%1.86%2.37%2.33%2.48%2.59%

Drawdowns

0386.HK vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 0386.HK drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than MSFT's maximum drawdown of -69.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 0386.HK and MSFT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-100.00%-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
-100.00%
-7.74%
0386.HK
MSFT

Volatility

0386.HK vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison

China Petroleum & Chemical Corp Class H (0386.HK) has a higher volatility of 11.55% compared to Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) at 5.19%. This indicates that 0386.HK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
11.55%
5.19%
0386.HK
MSFT

Financials

0386.HK vs. MSFT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between China Petroleum & Chemical Corp Class H and Microsoft Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Please note, different currencies. 0386.HK values in HKD, MSFT values in USD