PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
0386.HK vs. 0941.HK
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


0386.HK0941.HK
YTD Return14.44%17.32%
1Y Return8.35%15.10%
3Y Return (Ann)14.81%23.10%
5Y Return (Ann)7.17%8.63%
10Y Return (Ann)2.85%2.54%
Sharpe Ratio0.141.01
Daily Std Dev27.71%16.95%
Max Drawdown-100.00%-80.80%
Current Drawdown-100.00%-5.99%

Fundamentals


0386.HK0941.HK
Market CapHK$766.47BHK$1.56T
EPSHK$0.53HK$6.79
PE Ratio8.0610.27
PEG Ratio1.972.83
Total Revenue (TTM)HK$3.13THK$1.03T
Gross Profit (TTM)HK$472.02BHK$525.69B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between 0386.HK and 0941.HK is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

0386.HK vs. 0941.HK - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, 0386.HK achieves a 14.44% return, which is significantly lower than 0941.HK's 17.32% return. Over the past 10 years, 0386.HK has outperformed 0941.HK with an annualized return of 2.85%, while 0941.HK has yielded a comparatively lower 2.54% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


200.00%300.00%400.00%500.00%600.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
253.10%
603.14%
0386.HK
0941.HK

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

0386.HK vs. 0941.HK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for China Petroleum & Chemical Corp Class H (0386.HK) and China Mobile Ltd (0941.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


0386.HK
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for 0386.HK, currently valued at 0.17, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.000.17
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for 0386.HK, currently valued at 0.44, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.44
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for 0386.HK, currently valued at 1.11, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.11
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for 0386.HK, currently valued at 0.05, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.000.05
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for 0386.HK, currently valued at 0.64, compared to the broader market-10.00-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.000.64
0941.HK
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for 0941.HK, currently valued at 1.05, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.001.05
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for 0941.HK, currently valued at 1.66, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.66
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for 0941.HK, currently valued at 1.12, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.12
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for 0941.HK, currently valued at 0.86, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.000.86
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for 0941.HK, currently valued at 3.63, compared to the broader market-10.00-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.003.63

0386.HK vs. 0941.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 0386.HK Sharpe Ratio is 0.14, which is lower than the 0941.HK Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of 0386.HK and 0941.HK.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
0.17
1.05
0386.HK
0941.HK

Dividends

0386.HK vs. 0941.HK - Dividend Comparison

0386.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.72%, more than 0941.HK's 7.03% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
0386.HK
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp Class H
8.72%9.16%14.50%9.62%8.29%9.32%12.09%5.44%2.98%5.31%4.84%3.71%
0941.HK
China Mobile Ltd
7.03%7.16%8.95%7.24%7.36%4.45%4.52%3.62%3.27%3.32%3.49%4.32%

Drawdowns

0386.HK vs. 0941.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 0386.HK drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than 0941.HK's maximum drawdown of -80.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 0386.HK and 0941.HK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-100.00%-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
-100.00%
-5.84%
0386.HK
0941.HK

Volatility

0386.HK vs. 0941.HK - Volatility Comparison

China Petroleum & Chemical Corp Class H (0386.HK) has a higher volatility of 11.55% compared to China Mobile Ltd (0941.HK) at 3.69%. This indicates that 0386.HK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 0941.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
11.55%
3.69%
0386.HK
0941.HK

Financials

0386.HK vs. 0941.HK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between China Petroleum & Chemical Corp Class H and China Mobile Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in HKD except per share items