PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
0386.HK vs. 0939.HK
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


0386.HK0939.HK
YTD Return17.36%6.88%
1Y Return1.23%3.39%
3Y Return (Ann)18.93%-0.45%
5Y Return (Ann)5.37%0.36%
10Y Return (Ann)3.80%5.79%
Sharpe Ratio0.070.05
Daily Std Dev25.55%20.86%
Max Drawdown-71.31%-69.85%
Current Drawdown-3.85%-18.98%

Fundamentals


0386.HK0939.HK
Market CapHK$805.21BHK$1.27T
EPSHK$0.51HK$1.30
PE Ratio8.573.50
PEG Ratio2.490.79
Revenue (TTM)HK$3.21THK$622.34B
Gross Profit (TTM)HK$632.19BHK$667.93B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.6

The correlation between 0386.HK and 0939.HK is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

0386.HK vs. 0939.HK - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, 0386.HK achieves a 17.36% return, which is significantly higher than 0939.HK's 6.88% return. Over the past 10 years, 0386.HK has underperformed 0939.HK with an annualized return of 3.80%, while 0939.HK has yielded a comparatively higher 5.79% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


300.00%350.00%400.00%450.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
424.75%
438.70%
0386.HK
0939.HK

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


China Petroleum & Chemical Corp Class H

China Construction Bank Corp

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0386.HK vs. 0939.HK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for China Petroleum & Chemical Corp Class H (0386.HK) and China Construction Bank Corp (0939.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


0386.HK
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for 0386.HK, currently valued at 0.08, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.08
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for 0386.HK, currently valued at 0.32, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.32
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for 0386.HK, currently valued at 1.03, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.03
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for 0386.HK, currently valued at 0.08, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.08
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for 0386.HK, currently valued at 0.14, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.000.14
0939.HK
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for 0939.HK, currently valued at 0.06, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.06
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for 0939.HK, currently valued at 0.25, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.25
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for 0939.HK, currently valued at 1.03, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.03
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for 0939.HK, currently valued at 0.04, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.04
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for 0939.HK, currently valued at 0.11, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.000.11

0386.HK vs. 0939.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 0386.HK Sharpe Ratio is 0.07, which is higher than the 0939.HK Sharpe Ratio of 0.05. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of 0386.HK and 0939.HK.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.50NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
0.08
0.06
0386.HK
0939.HK

Dividends

0386.HK vs. 0939.HK - Dividend Comparison

0386.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.54%, less than 0939.HK's 8.49% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
0386.HK
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp Class H
7.54%8.84%14.50%9.62%8.29%9.32%12.09%5.44%2.98%5.31%4.84%3.71%
0939.HK
China Construction Bank Corp
8.49%9.08%8.71%7.24%5.94%5.19%5.34%4.44%5.41%7.18%5.93%5.76%

Drawdowns

0386.HK vs. 0939.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 0386.HK drawdown since its inception was -71.31%, roughly equal to the maximum 0939.HK drawdown of -69.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 0386.HK and 0939.HK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
-3.63%
-19.11%
0386.HK
0939.HK

Volatility

0386.HK vs. 0939.HK - Volatility Comparison

China Petroleum & Chemical Corp Class H (0386.HK) has a higher volatility of 7.48% compared to China Construction Bank Corp (0939.HK) at 5.31%. This indicates that 0386.HK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 0939.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%10.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
7.48%
5.31%
0386.HK
0939.HK

Financials

0386.HK vs. 0939.HK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between China Petroleum & Chemical Corp Class H and China Construction Bank Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in HKD except per share items