0116.HK vs. GTE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

0116.HK (CHOW SANG SANG) and GTE (Gran Tierra Energy Inc.) are both stocks. 0116.HK operates in Luxury Goods (Consumer Cyclical), while GTE operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy). Over the past 10 years, 0116.HK returned 2.12%/yr vs -12.43%/yr for GTE. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

0116.HK vs. GTE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in CHOW SANG SANG (0116.HK) and Gran Tierra Energy Inc. (GTE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

0116.HK is traded in HKD, while GTE is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GTE values have been converted to HKD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 0116.HK achieves a -7.07% return, which is significantly lower than GTE's 95.35% return. Over the past 10 years, 0116.HK has outperformed GTE with an annualized return of 2.12%, while GTE has yielded a comparatively lower -12.43% annualized return.

0116.HK

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -5.98%
• YTD: -7.07%
• 6M: -4.97%
• 1Y: 41.34%
• 3Y*: 13.05%
• 5Y*: 1.21%
• 10Y*: 2.12%

GTE

• 1D: 0.81%
• 1M: -12.39%
• YTD: 95.35%
• 6M: 76.25%
• 1Y: 67.33%
• 3Y*: 14.70%
• 5Y*: 3.15%
• 10Y*: -12.43%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

0116.HK vs. GTE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
0116.HK CHOW SANG SANG	-7.07%	99.76%	-22.16%	-9.81%	-0.25%	27.62%	-5.86%	-11.85%	-36.25%	34.39%
GTE Gran Tierra Energy Inc.	95.35%	-41.24%	27.53%	-43.04%	30.30%	110.34%	-71.93%	-40.87%	-19.45%	-9.91%

Correlation

The correlation between 0116.HK and GTE is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.05
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.09
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.07
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2007	0.06

Return for Risk

0116.HK vs. GTE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

0116.HK

0116.HK Risk / Return Rank: 67
0116.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
0116.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
0116.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 64
0116.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
0116.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 66

GTE

GTE Risk / Return Rank: 68
GTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
GTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
GTE Omega Ratio Rank: 66
GTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
GTE Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

0116.HK vs. GTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CHOW SANG SANG (0116.HK) and Gran Tierra Energy Inc. (GTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	0116.HK	GTE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.80	1.00	-0.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.68	1.63	+0.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.20	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.47	1.50	-0.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.96	2.70	+0.26
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

0116.HK vs. GTE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 0116.HK Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is comparable to the GTE Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 0116.HK and GTE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	0116.HK	GTE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80	1.00	-0.21
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.03	0.05	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.06	-0.18	+0.24
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.20	-0.04	+0.24

Drawdowns

0116.HK vs. GTE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 0116.HK drawdown since its inception was -78.55%, smaller than the maximum GTE drawdown of -98.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 0116.HK and GTE.

Drawdown Indicators

	0116.HK	GTE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-78.55%	-98.12%	+19.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.89%	-45.23%	+16.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-41.24%	-67.03%	+25.79%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-54.43%	-83.83%	+29.40%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-61.75%	-95.44%	+33.69%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-36.00%	-91.33%	+55.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-36.12%	-64.41%	+28.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.21%	25.06%	-10.85%

Volatility

0116.HK vs. GTE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CHOW SANG SANG (0116.HK) is 11.76%, while Gran Tierra Energy Inc. (GTE) has a volatility of 16.16%. This indicates that 0116.HK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GTE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	0116.HK	GTE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.76%	16.16%	-4.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.92%	52.19%	-23.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	53.37%	67.46%	-14.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	37.92%	63.88%	-25.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.69%	69.60%	-35.91%

Dividends

0116.HK vs. GTE - Dividend Comparison

0116.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.35%, while GTE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
0116.HK CHOW SANG SANG	9.35%	4.67%	8.47%	3.90%	4.16%	3.67%	3.41%	5.99%	4.91%	2.33%	1.53%	4.78%
GTE Gran Tierra Energy Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both 0116.HK and GTE in my portfolio?

0116.HK and GTE have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.