PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
0116.HK vs. OLA.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

0116.HK vs. OLA.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in CHOW SANG SANG (0116.HK) and Orla Mining Ltd. (OLA.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

0116.HK is traded in HKD, while OLA.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the OLA.TO values have been converted to HKD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 0116.HK achieves a -7.07% return, which is significantly higher than OLA.TO's -15.31% return. Over the past 10 years, 0116.HK has underperformed OLA.TO with an annualized return of 2.12%, while OLA.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 55.24% annualized return.


0116.HK

1D
0.00%
1M
-5.98%
YTD
-7.07%
6M
-4.97%
1Y
41.34%
3Y*
13.05%
5Y*
1.21%
10Y*
2.12%

OLA.TO

1D
0.90%
1M
-16.05%
YTD
-15.31%
6M
-17.31%
1Y
-1.81%
3Y*
34.78%
5Y*
20.88%
10Y*
55.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

0116.HK vs. OLA.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
0116.HK
CHOW SANG SANG
-7.07%99.76%-22.16%-9.81%-0.25%27.62%-5.86%-11.85%-36.25%34.39%
OLA.TO
Orla Mining Ltd.
-15.31%143.49%68.83%-19.38%6.05%-28.69%248.29%98.93%-45.47%53.40%

Correlation

The correlation between 0116.HK and OLA.TO is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2010

0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

0116.HK vs. OLA.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

0116.HK
0116.HK Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
0116.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
0116.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
0116.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
0116.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
0116.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

OLA.TO
OLA.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
OLA.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OLA.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
OLA.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
OLA.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
OLA.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

0116.HK vs. OLA.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CHOW SANG SANG (0116.HK) and Orla Mining Ltd. (OLA.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


0116.HKOLA.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.06

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.47

-0.04

+1.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.96

-0.09

+3.05

0116.HK vs. OLA.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 0116.HK Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is higher than the OLA.TO Sharpe Ratio of -0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 0116.HK and OLA.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


0116.HKOLA.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

-0.02

+0.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

0.35

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

0.75

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.20

0.15

+0.05

Drawdowns

0116.HK vs. OLA.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 0116.HK drawdown since its inception was -78.55%, smaller than the maximum OLA.TO drawdown of -97.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 0116.HK and OLA.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


0116.HKOLA.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.55%

-97.68%

+19.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.89%

-48.25%

+19.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-41.24%

-48.25%

+7.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.43%

-53.50%

-0.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.75%

-56.96%

-4.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.00%

-47.79%

+11.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.12%

-30.92%

-5.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.21%

20.59%

-6.38%

Volatility

0116.HK vs. OLA.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CHOW SANG SANG (0116.HK) is 11.76%, while Orla Mining Ltd. (OLA.TO) has a volatility of 23.40%. This indicates that 0116.HK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OLA.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


0116.HKOLA.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.76%

23.40%

-11.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.92%

52.92%

-24.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

53.37%

74.49%

-21.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.92%

60.30%

-22.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.69%

74.84%

-41.15%

Dividends

0116.HK vs. OLA.TO - Dividend Comparison

0116.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.35%, more than OLA.TO's 0.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
0116.HK
CHOW SANG SANG
9.35%4.67%8.47%3.90%4.16%3.67%3.41%5.99%4.91%2.33%1.53%4.78%
OLA.TO
Orla Mining Ltd.
0.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

0116.HK vs. OLA.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CHOW SANG SANG and Orla Mining Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. 0116.HK values in HKD, OLA.TO values in CAD

Frequently Asked Questions


0116.HK and OLA.TO have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 0116.HK and OLA.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer