^SIXU vs. CWT
^SIXU (Utilities Select Sector Index) is an index, while CWT (California Water Service Group) is a stock.
Performance
^SIXU vs. CWT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
^SIXU
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
CWT
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- -0.24%
- 6M
- 13.83%
- YTD
- 17.43%
- 1Y
- 10.84%
- 3Y*
- 1.23%
- 5Y*
- -2.29%
- 10Y*
- 6.29%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.58%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $24.21M | $23.35M | $24.82M |
^SIXU vs. CWT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
^SIXU Utilities Select Sector Index | -0.80% |
CWT California Water Service Group | -0.77% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
^SIXU vs. CWT — Risk / Return Rank
^SIXU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CWT
^SIXU vs. CWT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Utilities Select Sector Index (^SIXU) and California Water Service Group (CWT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ^SIXU | CWT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.11 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.92 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.74 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
^SIXU vs. CWT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ^SIXU drawdown since its inception was -0.80%, smaller than the maximum CWT drawdown of -38.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^SIXU and CWT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ^SIXU | CWT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.80% | -38.21% | +37.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -24.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -38.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.21% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.80% | -22.88% | +22.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.80% | -11.75% | +10.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 7.70% | — |
Volatility
^SIXU vs. CWT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ^SIXU | CWT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.85% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 19.17% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 24.72% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 24.33% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 27.72% | — |
Find the right allocation for ^SIXU and CWT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer