^SIXT vs. ROM
^SIXT (Technology Select Sector Index) is an index, while ROM (ProShares Ultra Technology) is Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P Technology Select Sector Index (200%).
Performance
^SIXT vs. ROM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
^SIXT
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
ROM
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- -7.06%
- 6M
- 38.35%
- YTD
- 37.33%
- 1Y
- 66.51%
- 3Y*
- 40.16%
- 5Y*
- 20.19%
- 10Y*
- 37.52%
- ALL TIME*
- 23.64%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $8.11M | $7.91M | $10.36M |
^SIXT vs. ROM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
^SIXT Technology Select Sector Index | -0.99% |
ROM ProShares Ultra Technology | -0.50% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
^SIXT vs. ROM — Risk / Return Rank
^SIXT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ROM
^SIXT vs. ROM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Technology Select Sector Index (^SIXT) and ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ^SIXT | ROM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.21 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.84 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.64 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
^SIXT vs. ROM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ^SIXT drawdown since its inception was -0.99%, smaller than the maximum ROM drawdown of -83.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^SIXT and ROM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ^SIXT | ROM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.99% | -83.36% | +82.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -32.33% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -48.10% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -67.55% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -67.55% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.99% | -24.28% | +23.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.99% | -20.84% | +19.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 12.79% | — |
Volatility
^SIXT vs. ROM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ^SIXT | ROM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 18.85% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 43.73% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 51.28% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 53.25% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 50.57% | — |
Find the right allocation for ^SIXT and ROM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer