^NQROBO vs. SCHG

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

^NQROBO (Nasdaq CTA Artificial Intelligence & Robotics) is an index, while SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. Over the past 5 years, ^NQROBO returned 2.20%/yr vs 15.67%/yr for SCHG. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure.

Performance

^NQROBO vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nasdaq CTA Artificial Intelligence & Robotics (^NQROBO) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^NQROBO achieves a 14.31% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 6.78% return.

^NQROBO

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 12.00%
• YTD: 14.31%
• 6M: 10.72%
• 1Y: 30.00%
• 3Y*: 9.90%
• 5Y*: 2.20%
• 10Y*: —

SCHG

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: 4.73%
• YTD: 6.78%
• 6M: 6.01%
• 1Y: 24.63%
• 3Y*: 25.14%
• 5Y*: 15.67%
• 10Y*: 18.74%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

^NQROBO vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
^NQROBO Nasdaq CTA Artificial Intelligence & Robotics	14.31%	15.10%	-0.80%	27.16%	-34.94%	9.94%	45.85%	33.93%	-11.27%	-0.00%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	6.78%	17.50%	34.95%	50.10%	-31.80%	28.11%	39.14%	36.02%	-1.36%	-0.30%

Correlation

The correlation between ^NQROBO and SCHG is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.74
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2017	0.80

The correlation between ^NQROBO and SCHG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

^NQROBO vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^NQROBO

^NQROBO Risk / Return Rank: 46
^NQROBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
^NQROBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
^NQROBO Omega Ratio Rank: 49
^NQROBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
^NQROBO Martin Ratio Rank: 41

SCHG

SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 40
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 45
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^NQROBO vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nasdaq CTA Artificial Intelligence & Robotics (^NQROBO) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	^NQROBO	SCHG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.41	1.60	-0.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.01	2.18	-0.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.28	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.35	1.51	-0.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.87	5.04	-1.17
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

^NQROBO vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^NQROBO Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is comparable to the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^NQROBO and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	^NQROBO	SCHG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.41	1.60	-0.19
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.10	0.71	-0.61
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.87	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.40	0.85	-0.45

Drawdowns

^NQROBO vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^NQROBO drawdown since its inception was -44.12%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^NQROBO and SCHG.

Drawdown Indicators

	^NQROBO	SCHG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.12%	-34.59%	-9.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.28%	-16.41%	-4.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.08%	-23.39%	-3.69%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-42.99%	-34.59%	-8.40%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.59%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.46%	-1.44%	-0.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.04%	-5.20%	-10.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.58%	4.90%	+2.68%

Volatility

^NQROBO vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

Nasdaq CTA Artificial Intelligence & Robotics (^NQROBO) has a higher volatility of 5.65% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 3.61%. This indicates that ^NQROBO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	^NQROBO	SCHG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.65%	3.61%	+2.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.36%	11.62%	+3.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.50%	15.49%	+5.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.14%	22.26%	-0.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.10%	21.55%	+0.55%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ^NQROBO and SCHG in my portfolio?

^NQROBO and SCHG have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ^NQROBO or SCHG?

^NQROBO has higher volatility (5.65%) compared to SCHG (3.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ^NQROBO dropped -44.12% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.