PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
^NDXT vs. ^IXIC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^NDXT vs. ^IXIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NASDAQ 100 Technology Sector Index (^NDXT) and NASDAQ Composite (^IXIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^NDXT achieves a 40.30% return, which is significantly higher than ^IXIC's 9.11% return. Over the past 10 years, ^NDXT has outperformed ^IXIC with an annualized return of 23.05%, while ^IXIC has yielded a comparatively lower 18.63% annualized return.


^NDXT

1D
1.70%
1M
2.79%
YTD
40.30%
6M
37.42%
1Y
53.65%
3Y*
31.58%
5Y*
15.71%
10Y*
23.05%

^IXIC

1D
-0.46%
1M
-4.87%
YTD
9.11%
6M
7.39%
1Y
26.96%
3Y*
23.89%
5Y*
12.04%
10Y*
18.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

^NDXT vs. ^IXIC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
^NDXT
NASDAQ 100 Technology Sector Index
40.30%22.46%7.13%66.70%-39.93%26.98%38.17%47.28%-5.49%36.68%
^IXIC
NASDAQ Composite
9.11%20.36%28.64%43.42%-33.10%21.39%43.64%35.23%-3.88%28.24%

Correlation

The correlation between ^NDXT and ^IXIC is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 2006

0.92

The correlation between ^NDXT and ^IXIC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

^NDXT vs. ^IXIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^NDXT
^NDXT Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
^NDXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^NDXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
^NDXT Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
^NDXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
^NDXT Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

^IXIC
^IXIC Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
^IXIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^IXIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
^IXIC Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
^IXIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
^IXIC Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^NDXT vs. ^IXIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NASDAQ 100 Technology Sector Index (^NDXT) and NASDAQ Composite (^IXIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


^NDXT^IXICDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.27

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.35

2.05

+1.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.49

7.60

+2.90

^NDXT vs. ^IXIC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^NDXT Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is higher than the ^IXIC Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^NDXT and ^IXIC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

^NDXT vs. ^IXIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^NDXT drawdown since its inception was -59.34%, smaller than the maximum ^IXIC drawdown of -77.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^NDXT and ^IXIC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


^NDXT^IXICDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.34%

-77.93%

+18.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.08%

-13.21%

-2.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.28%

-24.32%

-4.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.71%

-36.40%

-9.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.71%

-36.40%

-9.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.80%

-6.40%

+2.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.86%

-21.38%

+11.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.13%

3.56%

+1.57%

Volatility

^NDXT vs. ^IXIC - Volatility Comparison

NASDAQ 100 Technology Sector Index (^NDXT) has a higher volatility of 14.32% compared to NASDAQ Composite (^IXIC) at 7.54%. This indicates that ^NDXT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^IXIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


^NDXT^IXICDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.32%

7.54%

+6.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.25%

13.82%

+8.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.51%

17.54%

+8.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.17%

22.65%

+7.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.11%

22.08%

+6.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


^NDXT and ^IXIC have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

^NDXT has higher volatility (14.32%) compared to ^IXIC (7.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ^NDXT dropped -59.34% vs ^IXIC's -77.93%.

^NDXT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ^NDXT and ^IXIC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer