PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
^NDXT vs. ^VXN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^NDXT vs. ^VXN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NASDAQ 100 Technology Sector Index (^NDXT) and CBOE NASDAQ 100 Voltility Index (^VXN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

^NDXT vs. ^VXN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
^NDXT
NASDAQ 100 Technology Sector Index
-4.50%22.46%7.13%66.70%-39.93%26.98%38.17%47.28%-5.49%36.68%
^VXN
CBOE NASDAQ 100 Voltility Index
38.24%-1.81%22.96%-41.30%30.19%-21.28%59.44%-46.28%100.51%-6.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^NDXT achieves a -4.50% return, which is significantly lower than ^VXN's 38.24% return. Over the past 10 years, ^NDXT has outperformed ^VXN with an annualized return of 17.78%, while ^VXN has yielded a comparatively lower 4.84% annualized return.


^NDXT

1D
0.27%
1M
-0.24%
YTD
-4.50%
6M
-6.05%
1Y
24.43%
3Y*
19.36%
5Y*
8.19%
10Y*
17.78%

^VXN

1D
-1.89%
1M
-1.71%
YTD
38.24%
6M
35.13%
1Y
14.33%
3Y*
4.54%
5Y*
3.10%
10Y*
4.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

^NDXT vs. ^VXN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^NDXT
^NDXT Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
^NDXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^NDXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
^NDXT Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
^NDXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
^NDXT Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

^VXN
^VXN Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
^VXN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^VXN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
^VXN Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
^VXN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
^VXN Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^NDXT vs. ^VXN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NASDAQ 100 Technology Sector Index (^NDXT) and CBOE NASDAQ 100 Voltility Index (^VXN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


^NDXT^VXNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.81

0.13

+0.68

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.35

1.08

+0.28

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.12

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.60

0.15

+1.45

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.87

0.19

+4.68

^NDXT vs. ^VXN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^NDXT Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is higher than the ^VXN Sharpe Ratio of 0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^NDXT and ^VXN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


^NDXT^VXNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

0.13

+0.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.03

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

0.04

+0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

-0.03

+0.53

Correlation

The correlation between ^NDXT and ^VXN is -0.70. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Drawdowns

^NDXT vs. ^VXN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^NDXT drawdown since its inception was -59.34%, smaller than the maximum ^VXN drawdown of -87.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^NDXT and ^VXN.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


^NDXT^VXNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.34%

-87.50%

+28.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.08%

-61.32%

+45.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.71%

-72.97%

+27.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.71%

-86.01%

+40.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.89%

-67.22%

+56.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.95%

-69.39%

+59.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.30%

48.27%

-42.97%

Volatility

^NDXT vs. ^VXN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NASDAQ 100 Technology Sector Index (^NDXT) is 8.31%, while CBOE NASDAQ 100 Voltility Index (^VXN) has a volatility of 40.80%. This indicates that ^NDXT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^VXN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


^NDXT^VXNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.31%

40.80%

-32.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.51%

80.87%

-62.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.22%

110.87%

-80.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.47%

98.23%

-68.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.70%

108.83%

-81.13%