PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
^NDXT vs. SQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^NDXT vs. SQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NASDAQ 100 Technology Sector Index (^NDXT) and ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^NDXT achieves a 32.14% return, which is significantly higher than SQQQ's -38.86% return. Over the past 10 years, ^NDXT has outperformed SQQQ with an annualized return of 20.90%, while SQQQ has yielded a comparatively lower -55.08% annualized return.


^NDXT

1D
-2.76%
1M
-6.12%
6M
28.32%
YTD
32.14%
1Y
41.79%
3Y*
25.33%
5Y*
14.64%
10Y*
20.90%

SQQQ

1D
5.01%
1M
8.33%
6M
-36.79%
YTD
-38.86%
1Y
-54.36%
3Y*
-50.96%
5Y*
-45.88%
10Y*
-55.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

^NDXT vs. SQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
^NDXT
NASDAQ 100 Technology Sector Index
32.14%22.46%7.13%66.70%-39.93%26.98%38.17%47.28%-5.49%36.68%
SQQQ
ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ
-38.86%-53.05%-49.79%-73.61%82.40%-60.87%-86.40%-65.92%-20.83%-58.67%

Correlation

The correlation between ^NDXT and SQQQ is -0.92, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2010

-0.91

The correlation between ^NDXT and SQQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.93 to -0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

^NDXT vs. SQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^NDXT
^NDXT Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
^NDXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^NDXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
^NDXT Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
^NDXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
^NDXT Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

SQQQ
SQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
SQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
SQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
SQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
SQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^NDXT vs. SQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NASDAQ 100 Technology Sector Index (^NDXT) and ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


^NDXTSQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

0.83

+0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.61

-0.89

+3.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.91

-1.63

+9.54

^NDXT vs. SQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^NDXT Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is higher than the SQQQ Sharpe Ratio of -0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^NDXT and SQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

^NDXT vs. SQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^NDXT drawdown since its inception was -59.34%, smaller than the maximum SQQQ drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^NDXT and SQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


^NDXTSQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.34%

-100.00%

+40.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.08%

-61.03%

+44.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.28%

-92.51%

+63.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.71%

-97.27%

+51.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.71%

-99.97%

+54.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.40%

-100.00%

+90.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.85%

-92.76%

+82.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.30%

33.36%

-28.06%

Volatility

^NDXT vs. SQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NASDAQ 100 Technology Sector Index (^NDXT) is 11.41%, while ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ) has a volatility of 22.32%. This indicates that ^NDXT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


^NDXTSQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.41%

22.32%

-10.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.69%

46.22%

-22.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.87%

55.87%

-28.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.40%

67.91%

-37.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.18%

66.57%

-38.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


^NDXT and SQQQ have a correlation of -0.92, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SQQQ has higher volatility (22.32%) compared to ^NDXT (11.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ^NDXT dropped -59.34% vs SQQQ's -100.00%.

^NDXT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs -0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ^NDXT and SQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer