PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
^DXY vs. EEFT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^DXY vs. EEFT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in US Dollar Currency Index (^DXY) and Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (EEFT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

^DXY vs. EEFT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
^DXY
US Dollar Currency Index
1.27%-9.37%7.06%-2.11%7.87%6.71%-6.69%0.22%4.40%-9.87%
EEFT
Euronet Worldwide, Inc.
-13.27%-25.99%1.33%7.53%-20.80%-17.77%-8.02%53.90%21.49%16.35%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^DXY achieves a 1.27% return, which is significantly higher than EEFT's -13.27% return. Over the past 10 years, ^DXY has outperformed EEFT with an annualized return of 0.51%, while EEFT has yielded a comparatively lower -1.19% annualized return.


^DXY

1D
-0.39%
1M
1.21%
YTD
1.27%
6M
1.91%
1Y
-4.50%
3Y*
-0.96%
5Y*
1.37%
10Y*
0.51%

EEFT

1D
-0.54%
1M
-7.91%
YTD
-13.27%
6M
-25.18%
1Y
-39.39%
3Y*
-16.13%
5Y*
-14.18%
10Y*
-1.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

^DXY vs. EEFT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^DXY
^DXY Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
^DXY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^DXY Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
^DXY Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
^DXY Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
^DXY Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

EEFT
EEFT Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
EEFT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEFT Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEFT Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
EEFT Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEFT Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^DXY vs. EEFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for US Dollar Currency Index (^DXY) and Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (EEFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


^DXYEEFTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.62

-1.14

+0.52

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.80

-1.71

+0.91

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

0.80

+0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.59

-0.90

+0.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.01

-1.49

+0.47

^DXY vs. EEFT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^DXY Sharpe Ratio is -0.62, which is higher than the EEFT Sharpe Ratio of -1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^DXY and EEFT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


^DXYEEFTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.62

-1.14

+0.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

-0.41

+0.60

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

-0.03

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.08

0.10

-0.18

Correlation

The correlation between ^DXY and EEFT is -0.08. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Drawdowns

^DXY vs. EEFT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^DXY drawdown since its inception was -45.13%, smaller than the maximum EEFT drawdown of -87.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^DXY and EEFT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


^DXYEEFTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.13%

-87.91%

+42.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.31%

-42.27%

+34.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.68%

-58.54%

+42.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.68%

-61.76%

+46.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.41%

-61.22%

+37.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.18%

-33.76%

+5.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.20%

25.71%

-22.51%

Volatility

^DXY vs. EEFT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for US Dollar Currency Index (^DXY) is 2.19%, while Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (EEFT) has a volatility of 10.05%. This indicates that ^DXY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EEFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


^DXYEEFTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.19%

10.05%

-7.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.98%

23.73%

-19.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.05%

34.64%

-27.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.00%

34.79%

-27.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.53%

36.03%

-29.50%