^DVG vs. ZBH

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about NASDAQ US Dividend Achievers Select Index (^DVG) and Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. (ZBH).

Performance

^DVG vs. ZBH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NASDAQ US Dividend Achievers Select Index (^DVG) and Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. (ZBH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

^DVG vs. ZBH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
^DVG NASDAQ US Dividend Achievers Select Index	-3.33%	12.45%	16.48%	11.94%	-11.28%	21.39%	13.47%	27.27%	-3.92%	19.81%
ZBH Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.	1.51%	-14.03%	-12.46%	-3.81%	4.24%	-17.02%	3.77%	45.37%	-13.30%	17.86%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^DVG achieves a -3.33% return, which is significantly lower than ZBH's 1.51% return. Over the past 10 years, ^DVG has outperformed ZBH with an annualized return of 10.19%, while ZBH has yielded a comparatively lower -0.54% annualized return.

^DVG

• 1D: 2.18%
• 1M: -5.43%
• YTD: -3.33%
• 6M: -2.58%
• 1Y: 10.48%
• 3Y*: 11.89%
• 5Y*: 7.82%
• 10Y*: 10.19%

ZBH

• 1D: 0.67%
• 1M: -8.25%
• YTD: 1.51%
• 6M: -7.45%
• 1Y: -18.14%
• 3Y*: -10.21%
• 5Y*: -9.38%
• 10Y*: -0.54%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

^DVG vs. ZBH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^DVG

^DVG Risk / Return Rank: 45
^DVG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
^DVG Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
^DVG Omega Ratio Rank: 44
^DVG Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
^DVG Martin Ratio Rank: 53

ZBH

ZBH Risk / Return Rank: 15
ZBH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
ZBH Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
ZBH Omega Ratio Rank: 15
ZBH Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
ZBH Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^DVG vs. ZBH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NASDAQ US Dividend Achievers Select Index (^DVG) and Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. (ZBH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	^DVG	ZBH	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.67	-0.59	+1.26
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.07	-0.60	+1.67
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	0.91	+0.24
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.08	-0.80	+1.88
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.63	-1.20	+5.83
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

^DVG vs. ZBH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^DVG Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is higher than the ZBH Sharpe Ratio of -0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^DVG and ZBH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	^DVG	ZBH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67	-0.59	+1.26
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54	-0.36	+0.91
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.63	-0.02	+0.65
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.38	0.19	+0.19

Correlation

The correlation between ^DVG and ZBH is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Drawdowns

^DVG vs. ZBH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^DVG drawdown since its inception was -48.54%, smaller than the maximum ZBH drawdown of -65.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^DVG and ZBH.

Drawdown Indicators

	^DVG	ZBH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.54%	-65.03%	+16.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.84%	-23.33%	+12.49%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.58%	-48.59%	+27.01%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.85%	-49.73%	+17.88%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.58%	-45.25%	+38.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.90%	-19.86%	+12.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.52%	15.61%	-13.09%

Volatility

^DVG vs. ZBH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NASDAQ US Dividend Achievers Select Index (^DVG) is 4.26%, while Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. (ZBH) has a volatility of 7.57%. This indicates that ^DVG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZBH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	^DVG	ZBH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.26%	7.57%	-3.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.21%	23.33%	-15.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.86%	31.05%	-15.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.45%	26.05%	-11.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.25%	28.11%	-11.86%