^DVG vs. ZBH
^DVG (NASDAQ US Dividend Achievers Select Index) is an index, while ZBH (Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.) is a stock.
Performance
^DVG vs. ZBH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
^DVG
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZBH
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- 2.42%
- YTD
- -2.35%
- 6M
- -1.55%
- 1Y
- -3.29%
- 3Y*
- -14.56%
- 5Y*
- -10.56%
- 10Y*
- -1.76%
^DVG vs. ZBH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
^DVG NASDAQ US Dividend Achievers Select Index | 0.02% |
ZBH Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. | 0.55% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
^DVG vs. ZBH — Risk / Return Rank
^DVG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ZBH
^DVG vs. ZBH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NASDAQ US Dividend Achievers Select Index (^DVG) and Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. (ZBH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ^DVG | ZBH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.01 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.13 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -0.25 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
^DVG vs. ZBH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ^DVG drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum ZBH drawdown of -65.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^DVG and ZBH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ^DVG | ZBH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -65.03% | +65.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -25.54% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -43.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -48.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -52.14% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -47.33% | +47.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -20.11% | +20.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 13.32% | — |
Volatility
^DVG vs. ZBH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ^DVG | ZBH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.36% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 20.47% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 30.54% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 26.64% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 28.45% | — |
Find the right allocation for ^DVG and ZBH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer