PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
^DJUSBK vs. BAC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^DJUSBK vs. BAC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dow Jones U.S. Banks Index (^DJUSBK) and Bank of America Corporation (BAC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^DJUSBK achieves a -3.11% return, which is significantly higher than BAC's -4.19% return. Over the past 10 years, ^DJUSBK has underperformed BAC with an annualized return of 10.05%, while BAC has yielded a comparatively higher 16.28% annualized return.


^DJUSBK

1D
1.91%
1M
-1.95%
YTD
-3.11%
6M
2.71%
1Y
20.50%
3Y*
25.48%
5Y*
6.30%
10Y*
10.05%

BAC

1D
-0.15%
1M
0.40%
YTD
-4.19%
6M
-2.07%
1Y
20.00%
3Y*
25.09%
5Y*
6.37%
10Y*
16.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

^DJUSBK vs. BAC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
^DJUSBK
Dow Jones U.S. Banks Index
-3.11%27.82%32.77%6.63%-20.66%33.21%-16.53%34.78%-18.45%17.63%
BAC
Bank of America Corporation
-4.19%28.04%33.85%4.83%-23.82%49.61%-11.63%46.19%-15.00%35.69%

Correlation

The correlation between ^DJUSBK and BAC is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2000

0.90

The correlation between ^DJUSBK and BAC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

^DJUSBK vs. BAC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^DJUSBK
^DJUSBK Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
^DJUSBK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^DJUSBK Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
^DJUSBK Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
^DJUSBK Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
^DJUSBK Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

BAC
BAC Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
BAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAC Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
BAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAC Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^DJUSBK vs. BAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dow Jones U.S. Banks Index (^DJUSBK) and Bank of America Corporation (BAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


^DJUSBKBACDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.04

0.94

+0.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.47

1.35

+0.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.17

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.30

1.12

+0.18

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.56

2.89

+0.67

^DJUSBK vs. BAC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^DJUSBK Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is comparable to the BAC Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^DJUSBK and BAC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


^DJUSBKBACDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.04

0.94

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

0.24

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

0.53

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.11

0.20

-0.09

Drawdowns

^DJUSBK vs. BAC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^DJUSBK drawdown since its inception was -85.85%, smaller than the maximum BAC drawdown of -93.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^DJUSBK and BAC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


^DJUSBKBACDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.85%

-93.10%

+7.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.73%

-17.93%

+2.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.52%

-27.51%

+1.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.23%

-46.64%

+5.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.79%

-48.95%

-0.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.24%

-7.95%

+0.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.16%

-28.32%

+0.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.74%

6.93%

-1.19%

Volatility

^DJUSBK vs. BAC - Volatility Comparison

Dow Jones U.S. Banks Index (^DJUSBK) and Bank of America Corporation (BAC) have volatilities of 5.92% and 6.22%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


^DJUSBKBACDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.92%

6.22%

-0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.53%

16.10%

-0.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.72%

21.33%

-1.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.76%

26.85%

-2.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.25%

30.68%

-2.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, ^DJUSBK and BAC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BAC has higher volatility (6.22%) compared to ^DJUSBK (5.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ^DJUSBK dropped -85.85% vs BAC's -93.10%.

^DJUSBK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.04 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ^DJUSBK and BAC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer