iShares MSCI Min Vol EAFE Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XML.TO) belongs to the Global Equities category. Below you'll find alternative ETFs from the same category, ranked by key criteria, plus funds that investors commonly compare with XML.TO. Use the tables to find lower-cost options, better risk-adjusted returns, or a closer substitute for your current allocation.
Cheapest Alternatives to XML.TO
XML.TO charges 0.40% annually. There are 19 ETFs in the Global Equities category with lower expense ratios, going as low as 0.17%.
| Symbol | Name | Expense Ratio | AUM | Inception | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TD All-Equity ETF Portfolio | 0.17% | — | Apr 2025 | XML.TO vs TEQT.TO | |
| Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF | 0.17% | — | Nov 2023 | XML.TO vs MEQT.TO | |
| BMO All-Equity ETF | 0.20% | 789.04M | Jan 2022 | XML.TO vs ZEQT.TO | |
| iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio | 0.20% | 18.41B | Aug 2019 | XML.TO vs XEQT.TO | |
| Horizons All-Equity Asset Allocation ETF | 0.20% | — | Sep 2019 | XML.TO vs HEQT.TO |
Best Risk-Adjusted Alternatives to XML.TO
XML.TO has a PortfoliosLab risk / return rank of 35. There are 31 ETFs in the Global Equities category with higher risk-adjusted ranks, going as high as 89.
| Symbol | Name | Risk / Return Rank | AUM | Inception | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fidelity Global Equity+ Fund ETF | 89 | — | Oct 2023 | XML.TO vs FGEP.TO | |
| Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF | 88 | — | Nov 2023 | XML.TO vs MEQT.TO | |
| iShares International Fundamental Common Class | 82 | — | Feb 2007 | XML.TO vs CIE.NEO | |
| Vanguard All-Equity ETF Portfolio | 81 | 14.70B | Jan 2019 | XML.TO vs VEQT.TO | |
| TD All-Equity ETF Portfolio | 81 | — | Apr 2025 | XML.TO vs TEQT.TO |
Top Performing XML.TO Alternatives (YTD)
XML.TO is at 3.89% YTD. There are 35 ETFs in the Global Equities category with higher YTD returns, going as high as 25.71%.
| Symbol | Name | YTD Return | AUM | Inception | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard Global Momentum Factor ETF CAD | 25.71% | 464.43M | Jun 2016 | XML.TO vs VMO.TO | |
| CI Munro Global Growth Equity Fund | 21.24% | — | Jan 2021 | XML.TO vs CMGG.TO | |
| iShares International Fundamental Common Class | 17.83% | — | Feb 2007 | XML.TO vs CIE.NEO | |
| Fidelity Global Equity+ Fund ETF | 16.78% | — | Oct 2023 | XML.TO vs FGEP.TO | |
| Vanguard FTSE Developed All Cap ex U.S. Index ETF | 16.22% | 833.59M | Aug 2013 | XML.TO vs VDU.TO |
Lowest Volatility Alternatives to XML.TO
XML.TO has 8.50% 1-year volatility. There are 3 ETFs in the Global Equities category with lower 1-year volatility, going as low as 7.58%.
| Symbol | Name | Volatility 1Y | AUM | Inception | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 7.58% | 21.12M | Apr 2016 | XML.TO vs XMY.TO | |
| Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF | 7.65% | 41.80M | Jun 2016 | XML.TO vs VVO.TO | |
| iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF | 7.67% | 178.14M | Jul 2012 | XML.TO vs XMW.TO | |
| iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ET... | 9.67% | 167.91M | Jun 2017 | XML.TO vs XDGH.TO | |
| iShares Global Monthly Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hed... | 9.96% | 192.14M | Jan 2008 | XML.TO vs CYH.TO |
Lowest Drawdown Alternatives to XML.TO
XML.TO has a 1-year max drawdown of -4.88%. No ETFs in the Global Equities category have shallower 1-year drawdowns; the lowest-drawdown alternatives shown here go as shallow as -5.03%.
| Symbol | Name | Max Drawdown 1Y | AUM | Inception | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TD Active Global Infrastructure Equity ETF | -5.03% | 398.63M | May 2020 | XML.TO vs TINF.TO | |
| iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF | -5.14% | 178.14M | Jul 2012 | XML.TO vs XMW.TO | |
| iShares Global Monthly Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hed... | -5.34% | 192.14M | Jan 2008 | XML.TO vs CYH.TO | |
| iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | -5.35% | 21.12M | Apr 2016 | XML.TO vs XMY.TO | |
| iShares MSCI Min Vol EAFE Index ETF | -6.12% | 174.15M | Jul 2012 | XML.TO vs XMI.TO |
Other ETFs from iShares
The 10 most viewed iShares ETFs shown here include XDIV.TO, XEI.TO, XIC.TO and span 8 categories. AUM among these funds goes as high as $30B.
Often Compared With XML.TO
Investors most often compare XML.TO with XIN.TO, XMU.TO, HXQ.TO. These 18 comparison targets span 3 categories, based on PortfoliosLab usage data.
Compare XML.TO with Any Fund or Stock
Compare XML.TO with any ETF, mutual fund, or stock using PortfoliosLab's comparison tool.
Pair XML.TO with funds that move differently
iShares MSCI Min Vol EAFE Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) alternatives help with substitution. Diversifiers are the next step when you want funds with lower historical correlation to XML.TO.
Explore XML.TO Diversifiers