XML.TO vs. VIDY.TO
XML.TO (iShares MSCI Min Vol EAFE Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)) and VIDY.TO (Vanguard FTSE Developed ex North America High Dividend Yield Index ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - XML.TO tracks the MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility (USD) 100% Hedged to CAD Index while VIDY.TO tracks the FTSE Developed ex North America High Dividend Yield Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XML.TO returned 9.44%/yr vs 16.44%/yr for VIDY.TO. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XML.TO charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.31%/yr for VIDY.TO.
Performance
XML.TO vs. VIDY.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XML.TO achieves a 9.26% return, which is significantly lower than VIDY.TO's 17.58% return.
XML.TO
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 4.75%
- 6M
- 8.26%
- YTD
- 9.26%
- 1Y
- 15.77%
- 3Y*
- 14.42%
- 5Y*
- 9.44%
- 10Y*
- 7.49%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.71%
VIDY.TO
- 1D
- 0.98%
- 1M
- 3.97%
- 6M
- 13.54%
- YTD
- 17.58%
- 1Y
- 31.61%
- 3Y*
- 23.05%
- 5Y*
- 16.44%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.96%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA$1.96M | CA$2.16M | CA$2.22M | |
| CA$12.85K | CA$7.78K | CA$9.01K |
XML.TO vs. VIDY.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XML.TO iShares MSCI Min Vol EAFE Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 9.26% | 17.56% | 14.13% | 11.69% | -6.94% | 13.27% | -5.87% | 16.26% | -6.83% |
VIDY.TO Vanguard FTSE Developed ex North America High Dividend Yield Index ETF | 17.58% | 35.07% | 11.97% | 15.46% | 1.57% | 14.26% | -2.63% | 12.64% | -6.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between XML.TO and VIDY.TO is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2018 | 0.41 |
XML.TO vs. VIDY.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XML.TO
VIDY.TO
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Communication Services
Utilities
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Financial Services
XML.TO
VIDY.TO
Industrials
XML.TO
VIDY.TO
Consumer Defensive
XML.TO
VIDY.TO
Healthcare
XML.TO
VIDY.TO
Communication Services
XML.TO
VIDY.TO
Utilities
XML.TO
VIDY.TO
Energy
XML.TO
VIDY.TO
Consumer Cyclical
XML.TO
VIDY.TO
Technology
XML.TO
VIDY.TO
Real Estate
XML.TO
VIDY.TO
Basic Materials
XML.TO
VIDY.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XML.TO vs. VIDY.TO — Risk / Return Rank
XML.TO
VIDY.TO
XML.TO vs. VIDY.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Min Vol EAFE Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XML.TO) and Vanguard FTSE Developed ex North America High Dividend Yield Index ETF (VIDY.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XML.TO | VIDY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.44 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.45 | 3.03 | -0.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.64 | 11.68 | -4.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XML.TO vs. VIDY.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XML.TO drawdown since its inception was -28.62%, smaller than the maximum VIDY.TO drawdown of -31.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XML.TO and VIDY.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XML.TO | VIDY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.62% | -31.99% | +3.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.46% | -10.48% | +4.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.46% | -13.89% | +6.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.34% | -19.01% | +6.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.62% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.11% | +0.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.43% | -4.21% | +0.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.07% | 2.71% | -0.64% |
Volatility
XML.TO vs. VIDY.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Min Vol EAFE Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XML.TO) is 2.68%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed ex North America High Dividend Yield Index ETF (VIDY.TO) has a volatility of 3.19%. This indicates that XML.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VIDY.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XML.TO | VIDY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.68% | 3.19% | -0.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.79% | 11.10% | -3.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.27% | 13.27% | -4.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.81% | 13.53% | -3.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.92% | 16.38% | -4.46% |
XML.TO vs. VIDY.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XML.TO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than VIDY.TO's 0.31% expense ratio.
Dividends
XML.TO vs. VIDY.TO - Dividend Comparison
XML.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.66%, less than VIDY.TO's 2.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VIDY.TO Vanguard FTSE Developed ex North America High Dividend Yield Index ETF | 2.87% | 2.80% | 3.64% | 3.91% | 4.39% | 3.30% | 3.36% | 3.37% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XML.TO iShares MSCI Min Vol EAFE Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 2.66% | 2.76% | 2.67% | 2.56% | 2.02% | 1.92% | 1.11% | 3.62% | 2.79% | 1.91% | 3.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XML.TO and VIDY.TO have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VIDY.TO is cheaper at 0.31% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VIDY.TO is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for XML.TO.
XML.TO tracks MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility (USD) 100% Hedged to CAD Index, while VIDY.TO tracks FTSE Developed ex North America High Dividend Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for XML.TO and 0.31% for VIDY.TO.
Find the right allocation for XML.TO and VIDY.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer