VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A (CEBG.L) belongs to the China Equities category. Below you'll find alternative ETFs from the same category, ranked by key criteria, plus funds that investors commonly compare with CEBG.L. Use the tables to find lower-cost options, better risk-adjusted returns, or a closer substitute for your current allocation.
Cheapest Alternatives to CEBG.L
CEBG.L charges 0.60% annually. There are 26 ETFs in the China Equities category with lower expense ratios, going as low as 0.19%.
| Symbol | Name | Expense Ratio | AUM | Inception | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF | 0.19% | 1.60B | Jun 2019 | CEBG.L vs FLXC.L | |
| Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF | 0.19% | 1.19B | Jun 2019 | CEBG.L vs FRCH.L | |
| Xtrackers MSCI China A ESG Screened Swap UCITS ETF... | 0.29% | — | Jun 2022 | CEBG.L vs XCNA.L | |
| Lyxor MSCI China UCITS ETF - Acc | 0.29% | 652.30M | Jul 2018 | CEBG.L vs LCCN.L | |
| UBS ETF (IE) MSCI China A SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 0.30% | 61.51M | Feb 2020 | CEBG.L vs CNUA.L |
Best Risk-Adjusted Alternatives to CEBG.L
CEBG.L has a PortfoliosLab risk / return rank of 18. There are 22 ETFs in the China Equities category with higher risk-adjusted ranks, going as high as 92.
| Symbol | Name | Risk / Return Rank | AUM | Inception | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Invesco S&P China A 300 Swap UCITS ETF Acc | 92 | — | May 2022 | CEBG.L vs CA3S.L | |
| Invesco S&P China A MidCap 500 Swap UCITS ETF Acc | 91 | — | May 2022 | CEBG.L vs CM5S.L | |
| Invesco S&P China A 300 Swap UCITS ETF Acc | 89 | — | May 2022 | CEBG.L vs C300.L | |
| Invesco S&P China A MidCap 500 Swap UCITS ETF Acc | 88 | — | May 2022 | CEBG.L vs C500.L | |
| UBS ETF (IE) MSCI China A SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 88 | 61.51M | Feb 2020 | CEBG.L vs CNUA.L |
Top Performing CEBG.L Alternatives (YTD)
CEBG.L is at -3.84% YTD. There are 22 ETFs in the China Equities category with higher YTD returns, going as high as 19.25%.
| Symbol | Name | YTD Return | AUM | Inception | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Invesco S&P China A MidCap 500 Swap UCITS ETF Acc | 19.25% | — | May 2022 | CEBG.L vs CM5S.L | |
| Invesco S&P China A MidCap 500 Swap UCITS ETF Acc | 19.14% | — | May 2022 | CEBG.L vs C500.L | |
| Invesco S&P China A 300 Swap UCITS ETF Acc | 14.81% | — | May 2022 | CEBG.L vs CA3S.L | |
| Invesco S&P China A 300 Swap UCITS ETF Acc | 14.60% | — | May 2022 | CEBG.L vs C300.L | |
| Xtrackers Harvest FTSE China A-H 50 UCITS ETF 1D | 12.41% | 16.70M | Mar 2016 | CEBG.L vs AH50.L |
Lowest Volatility Alternatives to CEBG.L
CEBG.L has 15.81% 1-year volatility. There are 10 ETFs in the China Equities category with lower 1-year volatility, going as low as 12.18%.
| Symbol | Name | Volatility 1Y | AUM | Inception | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Access STOXX China A Minimum Variance UCITS... | 12.18% | 25.45M | Jun 2018 | CEBG.L vs M9SV.L | |
| Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D | 14.88% | 250.78M | Jan 2014 | CEBG.L vs RQFI.L | |
| JPMorgan China A Research Enhanced Index Equity (E... | 15.10% | — | Feb 2022 | CEBG.L vs JRCD.L | |
| JPMorgan China A Research Enhanced Index Equity (E... | 15.11% | — | Feb 2022 | CEBG.L vs JRCE.L | |
| HSBC MSCI CHINA A UCITS ETF | 15.33% | 100.91M | Jul 2018 | CEBG.L vs HMCA.L |
Lowest Drawdown Alternatives to CEBG.L
CEBG.L has a 1-year max drawdown of -13.28%. There are 20 ETFs in the China Equities category with shallower 1-year drawdowns, going as shallow as -5.69%.
| Symbol | Name | Max Drawdown 1Y | AUM | Inception | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D | -5.69% | 250.78M | Jan 2014 | CEBG.L vs RQFI.L | |
| Invesco S&P China A 300 Swap UCITS ETF Acc | -6.23% | — | May 2022 | CEBG.L vs CA3S.L | |
| Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C | -6.23% | 2.00B | Jun 2012 | CEBG.L vs XCHA.L | |
| Xtrackers MSCI China A ESG Screened Swap UCITS ETF... | -6.35% | — | Jun 2022 | CEBG.L vs XCNA.L | |
| JPMorgan China A Research Enhanced Index Equity (E... | -6.40% | — | Feb 2022 | CEBG.L vs JRCE.L |
Other ETFs from VanEck
The 10 most viewed VanEck ETFs shown here include TDGB.L, SMGB.L, DFNS.L and span 10 categories. AUM among these funds goes as high as $7B.
Often Compared With CEBG.L
Investors most often compare CEBG.L with HMCD.L, GLD, IASH.L. These 5 comparison targets span 3 categories, based on PortfoliosLab usage data.
| Symbol | Name | Category | Risk / Return Rank | YTD Return | AUM | Inception | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF | China Equities | 12 | -7.19% | 1.16B | Jan 2011 | CEBG.L vs HMCD.L | |
| SPDR Gold Shares | Gold, Precious Metals | 34 | 3.77% | 150.37B | Nov 2004 | CEBG.L vs GLD | |
| iShares MSCI China A UCITS USD | China Equities | 77 | 8.70% | 2.30B | Apr 2015 | CEBG.L vs IASH.L | |
| VanEck Junior Gold Miners UCITS ETF | Gold, Precious Metals | 40 | -1.48% | 935.94M | Mar 2015 | CEBG.L vs GJGB.L | |
| HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF | China Equities | 13 | -7.28% | 860.38M | Jan 2011 | CEBG.L vs HMCH.L |
Compare CEBG.L with Any Fund or Stock
Compare CEBG.L with any ETF, mutual fund, or stock using PortfoliosLab's comparison tool.
Â
Pair CEBG.L with funds that move differently
VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A alternatives help with substitution. Diversifiers are the next step when you want funds with lower historical correlation to CEBG.L.
Explore CEBG.L Diversifiers