CEBG.L vs. CNAL.L
CEBG.L (VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A) and CNAL.L (Lyxor Fortune SG UCITS MSCI China A DR) are both China Equities funds - CEBG.L tracks the MSCI China NR USD while CNAL.L tracks the MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CEBG.L returned 0.68%/yr vs 12.02%/yr for CNAL.L. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CEBG.L charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for CNAL.L.
Performance
CEBG.L vs. CNAL.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CEBG.L is traded in GBP, while CNAL.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CNAL.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEBG.L achieves a -5.78% return, which is significantly lower than CNAL.L's 13.91% return.
CEBG.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -3.54%
- YTD
- -5.78%
- 6M
- -6.28%
- 1Y
- 6.18%
- 3Y*
- 0.68%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CNAL.L
- 1D
- 1.52%
- 1M
- 3.45%
- YTD
- 13.91%
- 6M
- 14.81%
- 1Y
- 40.49%
- 3Y*
- 12.02%
- 5Y*
- 0.80%
- 10Y*
- 5.75%
CEBG.L vs. CNAL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEBG.L VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A | -5.78% | 15.45% | 1.26% | -14.25% | -19.48% | -21.21% |
CNAL.L Lyxor Fortune SG UCITS MSCI China A DR | 13.91% | 17.54% | 12.76% | -18.90% | -17.14% | 6.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between CEBG.L and CNAL.L is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2021 | 0.86 |
The correlation between CEBG.L and CNAL.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CEBG.L vs. CNAL.L — Risk / Return Rank
CEBG.L
CNAL.L
CEBG.L vs. CNAL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A (CEBG.L) and Lyxor Fortune SG UCITS MSCI China A DR (CNAL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CEBG.L | CNAL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.43 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.44 | 5.83 | -5.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.93 | 15.58 | -14.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CEBG.L vs. CNAL.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEBG.L drawdown since its inception was -57.08%, which is greater than CNAL.L's maximum drawdown of -51.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEBG.L and CNAL.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEBG.L | CNAL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.08% | -51.00% | -6.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.08% | -6.91% | -7.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.32% | -26.58% | -2.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -42.38% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.55% | -7.42% | -33.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.55% | -26.81% | -12.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.64% | 2.59% | +4.05% |
Volatility
CEBG.L vs. CNAL.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A (CEBG.L) is 3.61%, while Lyxor Fortune SG UCITS MSCI China A DR (CNAL.L) has a volatility of 6.16%. This indicates that CEBG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNAL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CEBG.L | CNAL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.61% | 6.16% | -2.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.69% | 11.48% | -0.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.89% | 16.40% | -0.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.10% | 21.50% | +5.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.10% | 21.94% | +5.16% |
CEBG.L vs. CNAL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEBG.L has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than CNAL.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
CEBG.L vs. CNAL.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CEBG.L nor CNAL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CEBG.L and CNAL.L have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CNAL.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CNAL.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for CEBG.L.
CEBG.L tracks MSCI China NR USD, while CNAL.L tracks MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for CEBG.L and 0.35% for CNAL.L.
Find the right allocation for CEBG.L and CNAL.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer