ZWE.TO vs. PDIV.TO
ZWE.TO (BMO Europe High Dividend Covered Call Hedged to CAD ETF) and PDIV.TO (Purpose Enhanced Dividend Fund ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZWE.TO is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by BMO, while PDIV.TO is a Dividend fund actively managed by Purpose Investments. Both are actively managed. Over the past 10 years, ZWE.TO returned 8.43%/yr vs 9.15%/yr for PDIV.TO. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZWE.TO charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for PDIV.TO.
Performance
ZWE.TO vs. PDIV.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZWE.TO achieves a 5.69% return, which is significantly lower than PDIV.TO's 10.54% return. Over the past 10 years, ZWE.TO has underperformed PDIV.TO with an annualized return of 8.43%, while PDIV.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 9.15% annualized return.
ZWE.TO
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- 6M
- 2.77%
- YTD
- 5.69%
- 1Y
- 14.12%
- 3Y*
- 11.02%
- 5Y*
- 9.31%
- 10Y*
- 8.43%
PDIV.TO
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 2.55%
- 6M
- 8.81%
- YTD
- 10.54%
- 1Y
- 20.27%
- 3Y*
- 12.19%
- 5Y*
- 8.06%
- 10Y*
- 9.15%
ZWE.TO vs. PDIV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZWE.TO BMO Europe High Dividend Covered Call Hedged to CAD ETF | 5.69% | 14.25% | 7.16% | 14.84% | 0.29% | 19.26% | -8.67% | 22.25% | -10.53% | 11.33% |
PDIV.TO Purpose Enhanced Dividend Fund ETF | 10.54% | 14.66% | 10.71% | 4.64% | -4.39% | 20.18% | -1.15% | 23.57% | -15.24% | 26.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZWE.TO and PDIV.TO is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2015 | 0.27 |
Over the past year, ZWE.TO and PDIV.TO have become more correlated (0.58) than their long-term average of 0.27, meaning their price movements have been converging.
ZWE.TO vs. PDIV.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ZWE.TO
PDIV.TO
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Energy
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
-
-
Financial Services
ZWE.TO
PDIV.TO
Industrials
ZWE.TO
PDIV.TO
Healthcare
ZWE.TO
PDIV.TO
Energy
ZWE.TO
PDIV.TO
Utilities
ZWE.TO
PDIV.TO
Consumer Defensive
ZWE.TO
PDIV.TO
Basic Materials
ZWE.TO
PDIV.TO
Communication Services
ZWE.TO
PDIV.TO
Technology
ZWE.TO
PDIV.TO
Consumer Cyclical
ZWE.TO
PDIV.TO
Real Estate
ZWE.TO
-
PDIV.TO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZWE.TO vs. PDIV.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZWE.TO
PDIV.TO
ZWE.TO vs. PDIV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Europe High Dividend Covered Call Hedged to CAD ETF (ZWE.TO) and Purpose Enhanced Dividend Fund ETF (PDIV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ZWE.TO | PDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.60 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.48 | 3.86 | -2.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.46 | 16.85 | -11.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ZWE.TO vs. PDIV.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZWE.TO drawdown since its inception was -35.38%, which is greater than PDIV.TO's maximum drawdown of -30.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZWE.TO and PDIV.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZWE.TO | PDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.38% | -30.64% | -4.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.56% | -5.27% | -4.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.60% | -8.82% | -4.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.60% | -15.93% | +2.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.38% | -30.64% | -4.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.59% | -0.30% | -1.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.08% | -4.32% | +0.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.59% | 1.21% | +1.38% |
Volatility
ZWE.TO vs. PDIV.TO - Volatility Comparison
BMO Europe High Dividend Covered Call Hedged to CAD ETF (ZWE.TO) has a higher volatility of 2.20% compared to Purpose Enhanced Dividend Fund ETF (PDIV.TO) at 1.33%. This indicates that ZWE.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PDIV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZWE.TO | PDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.20% | 1.33% | +0.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.22% | 5.52% | +3.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.08% | 6.88% | +4.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.58% | 10.06% | +2.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.20% | 13.91% | +1.29% |
ZWE.TO vs. PDIV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZWE.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than PDIV.TO's 0.77% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZWE.TO vs. PDIV.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZWE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.66%, less than PDIV.TO's 11.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDIV.TO Purpose Enhanced Dividend Fund ETF | 11.60% | 11.23% | 12.35% | 11.84% | 6.38% | 5.59% | 6.33% | 5.85% | 6.80% | 25.71% | 5.38% | 8.10% |
ZWE.TO BMO Europe High Dividend Covered Call Hedged to CAD ETF | 6.66% | 6.81% | 7.25% | 7.25% | 6.98% | 6.30% | 7.74% | 6.68% | 7.88% | 6.59% | 6.87% | 2.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZWE.TO and PDIV.TO have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZWE.TO is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZWE.TO is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for PDIV.TO.
ZWE.TO is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while PDIV.TO is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: BMO and Purpose Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ZWE.TO and 0.77% for PDIV.TO.
Find the right allocation for ZWE.TO and PDIV.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer