PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZWE.TO vs. PDIV.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZWE.TO vs. PDIV.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Europe High Dividend Covered Call Hedged to CAD ETF (ZWE.TO) and Purpose Enhanced Dividend Fund ETF (PDIV.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZWE.TO achieves a 5.69% return, which is significantly lower than PDIV.TO's 10.54% return. Over the past 10 years, ZWE.TO has underperformed PDIV.TO with an annualized return of 8.43%, while PDIV.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 9.15% annualized return.


ZWE.TO

1D
-0.46%
1M
0.32%
6M
2.77%
YTD
5.69%
1Y
14.12%
3Y*
11.02%
5Y*
9.31%
10Y*
8.43%

PDIV.TO

1D
-0.30%
1M
2.55%
6M
8.81%
YTD
10.54%
1Y
20.27%
3Y*
12.19%
5Y*
8.06%
10Y*
9.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZWE.TO vs. PDIV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZWE.TO
BMO Europe High Dividend Covered Call Hedged to CAD ETF
5.69%14.25%7.16%14.84%0.29%19.26%-8.67%22.25%-10.53%11.33%
PDIV.TO
Purpose Enhanced Dividend Fund ETF
10.54%14.66%10.71%4.64%-4.39%20.18%-1.15%23.57%-15.24%26.84%

Correlation

The correlation between ZWE.TO and PDIV.TO is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2015

0.27

Over the past year, ZWE.TO and PDIV.TO have become more correlated (0.58) than their long-term average of 0.27, meaning their price movements have been converging.

ZWE.TO vs. PDIV.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ZWE.TO
PDIV.TO

Financial Services

24.2%
35.7%

Industrials

13.5%
5.9%

Healthcare

12.5%
5.4%

Energy

9.8%
12.9%

Utilities

9.8%
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

8.3%
3.4%

Basic Materials

7.0%
4.5%

Communication Services

6.4%
4.0%

Technology

5.2%
16.5%

Consumer Cyclical

3.3%
7.5%

Real Estate

-

-

Financial Services

ZWE.TO
24.2%
PDIV.TO
35.7%

Industrials

ZWE.TO
13.5%
PDIV.TO
5.9%

Healthcare

ZWE.TO
12.5%
PDIV.TO
5.4%

Energy

ZWE.TO
9.8%
PDIV.TO
12.9%

Utilities

ZWE.TO
9.8%
PDIV.TO
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

ZWE.TO
8.3%
PDIV.TO
3.4%

Basic Materials

ZWE.TO
7.0%
PDIV.TO
4.5%

Communication Services

ZWE.TO
6.4%
PDIV.TO
4.0%

Technology

ZWE.TO
5.2%
PDIV.TO
16.5%

Consumer Cyclical

ZWE.TO
3.3%
PDIV.TO
7.5%

Real Estate

ZWE.TO

-

PDIV.TO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZWE.TO vs. PDIV.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZWE.TO
ZWE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
ZWE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZWE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZWE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
ZWE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZWE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

PDIV.TO
PDIV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
PDIV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDIV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDIV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
PDIV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDIV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZWE.TO vs. PDIV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Europe High Dividend Covered Call Hedged to CAD ETF (ZWE.TO) and Purpose Enhanced Dividend Fund ETF (PDIV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ZWE.TOPDIV.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.60

-0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.48

3.86

-2.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.46

16.85

-11.39

ZWE.TO vs. PDIV.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZWE.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is lower than the PDIV.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZWE.TO and PDIV.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZWE.TO vs. PDIV.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZWE.TO drawdown since its inception was -35.38%, which is greater than PDIV.TO's maximum drawdown of -30.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZWE.TO and PDIV.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZWE.TOPDIV.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.38%

-30.64%

-4.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.56%

-5.27%

-4.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.60%

-8.82%

-4.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.60%

-15.93%

+2.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.38%

-30.64%

-4.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.59%

-0.30%

-1.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.08%

-4.32%

+0.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.59%

1.21%

+1.38%

Volatility

ZWE.TO vs. PDIV.TO - Volatility Comparison

BMO Europe High Dividend Covered Call Hedged to CAD ETF (ZWE.TO) has a higher volatility of 2.20% compared to Purpose Enhanced Dividend Fund ETF (PDIV.TO) at 1.33%. This indicates that ZWE.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PDIV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZWE.TOPDIV.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.20%

1.33%

+0.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.22%

5.52%

+3.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.08%

6.88%

+4.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.58%

10.06%

+2.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.20%

13.91%

+1.29%

ZWE.TO vs. PDIV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZWE.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than PDIV.TO's 0.77% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZWE.TO vs. PDIV.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZWE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.66%, less than PDIV.TO's 11.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PDIV.TO
Purpose Enhanced Dividend Fund ETF
11.60%11.23%12.35%11.84%6.38%5.59%6.33%5.85%6.80%25.71%5.38%8.10%
ZWE.TO
BMO Europe High Dividend Covered Call Hedged to CAD ETF
6.66%6.81%7.25%7.25%6.98%6.30%7.74%6.68%7.88%6.59%6.87%2.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZWE.TO and PDIV.TO have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZWE.TO is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZWE.TO is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for PDIV.TO.

ZWE.TO is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while PDIV.TO is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: BMO and Purpose Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ZWE.TO and 0.77% for PDIV.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZWE.TO and PDIV.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer