PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZWC.TO vs. EIT-UN.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZWC.TO vs. EIT-UN.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO CA High Dividend Covered Call ETF (ZWC.TO) and Canoe EIT Income Fund (EIT-UN.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZWC.TO achieves a 11.12% return, which is significantly lower than EIT-UN.TO's 27.79% return.


ZWC.TO

1D
-0.27%
1M
2.71%
YTD
11.12%
6M
12.78%
1Y
28.05%
3Y*
17.17%
5Y*
11.09%
10Y*

EIT-UN.TO

1D
23.25%
1M
24.15%
YTD
27.79%
6M
33.97%
1Y
25.62%
3Y*
22.10%
5Y*
131.16%
10Y*
118.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZWC.TO vs. EIT-UN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZWC.TO
BMO CA High Dividend Covered Call ETF
11.12%22.79%12.00%7.54%-3.54%25.39%-6.92%17.32%-10.05%7.34%
EIT-UN.TO
Canoe EIT Income Fund
27.79%3.45%28.25%5.94%10.49%4,164.28%1,973.94%12.45%-3.08%9.11%

Correlation

The correlation between ZWC.TO and EIT-UN.TO is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2017

0.54

Over the past year, the correlation between ZWC.TO and EIT-UN.TO has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.54, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZWC.TO vs. EIT-UN.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZWC.TO
ZWC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
ZWC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZWC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZWC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
ZWC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZWC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

EIT-UN.TO
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZWC.TO vs. EIT-UN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO CA High Dividend Covered Call ETF (ZWC.TO) and Canoe EIT Income Fund (EIT-UN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZWC.TOEIT-UN.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.69

3.53

-1.84

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

23.23

ZWC.TO vs. EIT-UN.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZWC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.61, which is higher than the EIT-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZWC.TO and EIT-UN.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZWC.TOEIT-UN.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.61

1.00

+2.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.10

0.11

+0.99

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.00

+0.56

Drawdowns

ZWC.TO vs. EIT-UN.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZWC.TO drawdown since its inception was -40.57%, smaller than the maximum EIT-UN.TO drawdown of -56.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZWC.TO and EIT-UN.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZWC.TOEIT-UN.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.57%

-56.65%

+16.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.99%

0.00%

-5.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.09%

-10.73%

+1.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.43%

-15.57%

-0.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.97%

0.00%

-0.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.69%

-3.87%

-0.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.21%

6.16%

-4.95%

Volatility

ZWC.TO vs. EIT-UN.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BMO CA High Dividend Covered Call ETF (ZWC.TO) is 2.40%, while Canoe EIT Income Fund (EIT-UN.TO) has a volatility of 20.88%. This indicates that ZWC.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EIT-UN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZWC.TOEIT-UN.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.40%

20.88%

-18.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.77%

21.29%

-14.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.80%

25.85%

-18.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.13%

1,193.88%

-1,183.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.94%

1,020.22%

-1,005.28%

ZWC.TO vs. EIT-UN.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZWC.TO has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is lower than EIT-UN.TO's 1.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZWC.TO vs. EIT-UN.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZWC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.64%, less than EIT-UN.TO's 10.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EIT-UN.TO
Canoe EIT Income Fund
10.19%12.56%7.90%9.29%8.97%104.98%108.64%11.53%11.62%11.01%10.06%10.71%
ZWC.TO
BMO CA High Dividend Covered Call ETF
5.64%5.92%6.73%7.62%7.01%6.60%8.15%6.92%7.11%5.46%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZWC.TO and EIT-UN.TO have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZWC.TO and EIT-UN.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer