PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
EIT-UN.TO vs. XEQT.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

EIT-UN.TO vs. XEQT.TO

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Canoe EIT Income Fund (EIT-UN.TO) and iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO).

EIT-UN.TO is an actively managed fund by Canoe. It was launched on Aug 6, 1997. XEQT.TO is an actively managed fund by iShares. It was launched on Aug 7, 2019.

Performance

EIT-UN.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Canoe EIT Income Fund (EIT-UN.TO) and iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EIT-UN.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
EIT-UN.TO
Canoe EIT Income Fund		7.65%11.81%27.99%5.94%10.49%4,164.28%1,973.94%3.55%
XEQT.TO
iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio		1.51%19.47%24.36%17.25%-11.01%18.94%11.82%9.89%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EIT-UN.TO achieves a 7.65% return, which is significantly higher than XEQT.TO's 1.51% return.

EIT-UN.TO

1D
-0.84%
1M
-2.89%
YTD
7.65%
6M
11.53%
1Y
18.90%
3Y*
19.06%
5Y*
130.78%
10Y*
117.77%

XEQT.TO

1D
0.85%
1M
-3.50%
YTD
1.51%
6M
2.89%
1Y
21.17%
3Y*
18.44%
5Y*
11.98%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Canoe EIT Income Fund

iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio

Often compared with EIT-UN.TO:
EIT-UN.TO vs. HDIV.TOEIT-UN.TO vs. DFN.TOEIT-UN.TO vs. MNS.TOEIT-UN.TO vs. ZEB.TOEIT-UN.TO vs. HYLD.TOEIT-UN.TO vs. CLSA.TOEIT-UN.TO vs. XEI.TO
Often compared with XEQT.TO:
XEQT.TO vs. VFV.TOXEQT.TO vs. VEQT.TOXEQT.TO vs. XGRO.TOXEQT.TO vs. ZEQT.TOXEQT.TO vs. VGRO.TOXEQT.TO vs. XEI.TOXEQT.TO vs. XAW.TO

EIT-UN.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EIT-UN.TO has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than XEQT.TO's 0.20% expense ratio.

EIT-UN.TO
Canoe EIT Income Fund
XEQT.TO
iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio

Return for Risk

EIT-UN.TO vs. XEQT.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
EIT-UN.TO
EIT-UN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
EIT-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIT-UN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIT-UN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
EIT-UN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIT-UN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
XEQT.TO
XEQT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
XEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEQT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEQT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
XEQT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEQT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EIT-UN.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Canoe EIT Income Fund (EIT-UN.TO) and iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

EIT-UN.TOXEQT.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.50

1.33

+0.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.21

1.85

+0.36

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.29

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.20

1.79

+0.41

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.73

7.98

+2.75

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EIT-UN.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EIT-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is comparable to the XEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EIT-UN.TO and XEQT.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

EIT-UN.TOXEQT.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.50

1.33

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

0.93

-0.81

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

—

0.86

—

Correlation

The correlation between EIT-UN.TO and XEQT.TO is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

EIT-UN.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Dividend Comparison

EIT-UN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.22%, more than XEQT.TO's 1.64% yield.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EIT-UN.TO
Canoe EIT Income Fund		7.22%7.64%7.90%9.29%8.97%104.98%108.64%11.53%11.62%11.01%10.06%10.71%
XEQT.TO
iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio		1.64%1.66%2.01%2.07%2.12%1.64%1.66%1.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

EIT-UN.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EIT-UN.TO drawdown since its inception was -100.11%, which is greater than XEQT.TO's maximum drawdown of -29.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIT-UN.TO and XEQT.TO.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

EIT-UN.TOXEQT.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-100.11%

-29.74%

-70.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.68%

-11.78%

+3.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.57%

-19.56%

+3.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.36%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-100.00%

-4.27%

-95.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-99.24%

-4.20%

-95.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.78%

2.64%

-0.86%

Volatility

EIT-UN.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Canoe EIT Income Fund (EIT-UN.TO) is 4.95%, while iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO) has a volatility of 5.77%. This indicates that EIT-UN.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XEQT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

EIT-UN.TOXEQT.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.95%

5.77%

-0.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.21%

9.49%

-2.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.67%

15.99%

-3.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1,193.82%

13.03%

+1,180.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1,019.98%

15.63%

+1,004.35%