PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
EIT-UN.TO vs. MNS.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

EIT-UN.TO vs. MNS.TO

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Canoe EIT Income Fund (EIT-UN.TO) and Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Silver Reserves (MNS.TO).

EIT-UN.TO is an actively managed fund by Canoe. It was launched on Aug 6, 1997. MNS.TO is a passively managed fund by Royal Canadian Mint that tracks the performance of the N/A (Physical Bullion). It was launched on Oct 29, 2012.

Performance

EIT-UN.TO vs. MNS.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Canoe EIT Income Fund (EIT-UN.TO) and Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Silver Reserves (MNS.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EIT-UN.TO vs. MNS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EIT-UN.TO
Canoe EIT Income Fund		7.65%11.81%27.99%5.94%10.49%4,164.28%1,973.94%12.45%-3.08%10.49%
MNS.TO
Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Silver Reserves		-6.18%161.12%41.73%-5.85%5.27%-15.46%45.70%9.85%-1.65%-1.63%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EIT-UN.TO achieves a 7.65% return, which is significantly higher than MNS.TO's -6.18% return. Over the past 10 years, EIT-UN.TO has outperformed MNS.TO with an annualized return of 117.77%, while MNS.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 17.31% annualized return.

EIT-UN.TO

1D
-0.84%
1M
-2.89%
YTD
7.65%
6M
11.53%
1Y
18.90%
3Y*
19.06%
5Y*
130.78%
10Y*
117.77%

MNS.TO

1D
1.39%
1M
-15.84%
YTD
-6.18%
6M
48.75%
1Y
110.50%
3Y*
44.87%
5Y*
25.50%
10Y*
17.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Canoe EIT Income Fund

Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Silver Reserves

Often compared with EIT-UN.TO:
EIT-UN.TO vs. HDIV.TOEIT-UN.TO vs. XEQT.TOEIT-UN.TO vs. DFN.TOEIT-UN.TO vs. ZEB.TOEIT-UN.TO vs. HYLD.TOEIT-UN.TO vs. CLSA.TOEIT-UN.TO vs. XEI.TO
Often compared with MNS.TO:
MNS.TO vs. SLVMNS.TO vs. PSLV.TOMNS.TO vs. SBT.TOMNS.TO vs. SVR.TOMNS.TO vs. MNT.TOMNS.TO vs. SVR-C.TOMNS.TO vs. PSLV

EIT-UN.TO vs. MNS.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EIT-UN.TO has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than MNS.TO's 0.45% expense ratio.

EIT-UN.TO
Canoe EIT Income Fund
MNS.TO
Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Silver Reserves

Return for Risk

EIT-UN.TO vs. MNS.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
EIT-UN.TO
EIT-UN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
EIT-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIT-UN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIT-UN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
EIT-UN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIT-UN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
MNS.TO
MNS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
MNS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MNS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
MNS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
MNS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
MNS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EIT-UN.TO vs. MNS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Canoe EIT Income Fund (EIT-UN.TO) and Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Silver Reserves (MNS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

EIT-UN.TOMNS.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.50

2.13

-0.63

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.21

2.21

0.00

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.39

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.20

2.84

-0.65

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.73

8.88

+1.85

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EIT-UN.TO vs. MNS.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EIT-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is comparable to the MNS.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EIT-UN.TO and MNS.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

EIT-UN.TOMNS.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.50

2.13

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

0.81

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

0.60

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

—

0.30

—

Correlation

The correlation between EIT-UN.TO and MNS.TO is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

EIT-UN.TO vs. MNS.TO - Dividend Comparison

EIT-UN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.22%, while MNS.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EIT-UN.TO
Canoe EIT Income Fund		7.22%7.64%7.90%9.29%8.97%104.98%108.64%11.53%11.62%11.01%10.06%10.71%
MNS.TO
Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Silver Reserves		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

EIT-UN.TO vs. MNS.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EIT-UN.TO drawdown since its inception was -100.11%, which is greater than MNS.TO's maximum drawdown of -51.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIT-UN.TO and MNS.TO.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

EIT-UN.TOMNS.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-100.11%

-51.12%

-48.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.68%

-38.31%

+29.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.57%

-38.31%

+22.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.36%

-42.02%

-8.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-100.00%

-30.33%

-69.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-99.24%

-28.13%

-71.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.78%

12.25%

-10.47%

Volatility

EIT-UN.TO vs. MNS.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Canoe EIT Income Fund (EIT-UN.TO) is 4.95%, while Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Silver Reserves (MNS.TO) has a volatility of 15.40%. This indicates that EIT-UN.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MNS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

EIT-UN.TOMNS.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.95%

15.40%

-10.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.21%

51.42%

-44.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.67%

52.30%

-39.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1,193.82%

33.79%

+1,160.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1,019.98%

31.65%

+988.33%