ZVOL vs. OOQB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ZVOL (Volatility Premium Plus ETF) and OOQB (Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZVOL is a Volatility fund tracking the S&P 500 VIX Mid Term Futures Inverse Daily Index, while OOQB is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Volatility Shares. ZVOL is passively managed, while OOQB is actively managed. Over the past year, ZVOL returned 8.27% vs -27.35% for OOQB. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ZVOL charges 1.35%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for OOQB.

Performance

ZVOL vs. OOQB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Volatility Premium Plus ETF (ZVOL) and Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF (OOQB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZVOL achieves a -2.29% return, which is significantly higher than OOQB's -18.43% return.

ZVOL

• 1D: -0.60%
• 1M: 2.30%
• YTD: -2.29%
• 6M: 2.14%
• 1Y: 8.27%
• 3Y*: 9.26%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

OOQB

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: -18.43%
• 6M: -24.99%
• 1Y: -27.35%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZVOL vs. OOQB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ZVOL Volatility Premium Plus ETF	-2.29%	-9.44%
OOQB Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF	-18.43%	-13.30%

Correlation

The correlation between ZVOL and OOQB is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025	0.52

The correlation between ZVOL and OOQB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ZVOL vs. OOQB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZVOL

ZVOL Risk / Return Rank: 16
ZVOL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
ZVOL Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
ZVOL Omega Ratio Rank: 15
ZVOL Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
ZVOL Martin Ratio Rank: 17

OOQB

OOQB Risk / Return Rank: 4
OOQB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
OOQB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
OOQB Omega Ratio Rank: 4
OOQB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
OOQB Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZVOL vs. OOQB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Volatility Premium Plus ETF (ZVOL) and Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF (OOQB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ZVOL	OOQB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.44	-0.53	+0.98
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.79	-0.50	+1.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	0.94	+0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.50	-0.51	+1.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.62	-0.91	+2.53
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ZVOL vs. OOQB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZVOL Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is higher than the OOQB Sharpe Ratio of -0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZVOL and OOQB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ZVOL	OOQB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44	-0.53	+0.98
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.43	-0.41	+0.84

Drawdowns

ZVOL vs. OOQB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZVOL drawdown since its inception was -37.25%, smaller than the maximum OOQB drawdown of -53.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZVOL and OOQB.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZVOL	OOQB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.25%	-53.44%	+16.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.46%	-53.44%	+36.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-37.25%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-22.17%	-43.69%	+21.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.43%	-23.26%	+9.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.12%	30.11%	-24.99%

Volatility

ZVOL vs. OOQB - Volatility Comparison

Volatility Premium Plus ETF (ZVOL) has a higher volatility of 3.59% compared to Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF (OOQB) at 0.00%. This indicates that ZVOL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OOQB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZVOL	OOQB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.59%	0.00%	+3.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.27%	39.39%	-26.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.74%	51.57%	-32.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.27%	58.12%	-28.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.27%	58.12%	-28.85%

ZVOL vs. OOQB - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZVOL has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is higher than OOQB's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

ZVOL vs. OOQB - Dividend Comparison

ZVOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 71.14%, more than OOQB's 11.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
OOQB Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF	11.62%	9.53%	0.00%	0.00%
ZVOL Volatility Premium Plus ETF	71.14%	53.44%	30.68%	0.55%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ZVOL and OOQB in my portfolio?

ZVOL and OOQB have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ZVOL or OOQB?

ZVOL has higher volatility (3.59%) compared to OOQB (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZVOL dropped -37.25% vs OOQB's -53.44%.

Which ETF is better, ZVOL or OOQB?

On 1-year performance, ZVOL leads with 8.27% vs -27.35% for OOQB. On fees, OOQB is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, OOQB has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ZVOL or OOQB?

Over the 1-year period, ZVOL has performed better with a 8.27% return vs -27.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ZVOL or OOQB?

OOQB is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.35% for ZVOL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ZVOL or OOQB?

ZVOL has the higher dividend yield at 71.14%, compared with 11.62% for OOQB.

What is the main difference between ZVOL and OOQB?

ZVOL is categorized as Volatility, while OOQB is Nasdaq-100. Their fees differ too: 1.35% for ZVOL and 0.75% for OOQB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ZVOL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.44 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.