ZVNBX vs. FXH
Compare and contrast key facts about Zevenbergen Growth Fund (ZVNBX) and First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund (FXH).
ZVNBX is managed by Zevenbergen Capital Investments. It was launched on Aug 31, 2015. FXH is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the StrataQuant Health Care Index. It was launched on May 8, 2007.
Performance
ZVNBX vs. FXH - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ZVNBX vs. FXH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZVNBX Zevenbergen Growth Fund | -15.05% | 9.93% | 34.10% | 63.92% | -54.79% | -9.19% | 123.87% | 37.73% | 5.88% | 33.71% |
FXH First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund | -2.85% | 10.16% | 0.96% | -4.53% | -12.24% | 15.20% | 28.00% | 22.26% | -1.33% | 21.82% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZVNBX achieves a -15.05% return, which is significantly lower than FXH's -2.85% return. Over the past 10 years, ZVNBX has outperformed FXH with an annualized return of 14.42%, while FXH has yielded a comparatively lower 7.03% annualized return.
ZVNBX
- 1D
- 4.84%
- 1M
- -7.82%
- YTD
- -15.05%
- 6M
- -17.30%
- 1Y
- 8.30%
- 3Y*
- 16.16%
- 5Y*
- -2.10%
- 10Y*
- 14.42%
FXH
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- -2.25%
- YTD
- -2.85%
- 6M
- -1.58%
- 1Y
- 7.70%
- 3Y*
- 1.35%
- 5Y*
- 0.55%
- 10Y*
- 7.03%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ZVNBX vs. FXH - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZVNBX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than FXH's 0.61% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ZVNBX vs. FXH — Risk / Return Rank
ZVNBX
FXH
ZVNBX vs. FXH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zevenbergen Growth Fund (ZVNBX) and First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund (FXH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZVNBX | FXH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.33 | 0.40 | -0.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.69 | 0.72 | -0.03 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.09 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.31 | 0.68 | -0.38 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.93 | 2.12 | -1.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZVNBX | FXH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 | 0.40 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.06 | 0.03 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | 0.38 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.51 | -0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between ZVNBX and FXH is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
ZVNBX vs. FXH - Dividend Comparison
ZVNBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, more than FXH's 0.88% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZVNBX Zevenbergen Growth Fund | 1.49% | 1.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.95% | 0.07% |
FXH First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund | 0.88% | 0.75% | 0.41% | 0.24% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ZVNBX vs. FXH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZVNBX drawdown since its inception was -66.30%, which is greater than FXH's maximum drawdown of -43.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZVNBX and FXH.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZVNBX | FXH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.30% | -43.70% | -22.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.79% | -12.20% | -14.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.28% | -29.49% | -33.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.30% | -30.61% | -35.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.33% | -12.26% | -16.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.85% | -9.45% | -10.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.85% | 3.93% | +4.92% |
Volatility
ZVNBX vs. FXH - Volatility Comparison
Zevenbergen Growth Fund (ZVNBX) has a higher volatility of 9.56% compared to First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund (FXH) at 7.02%. This indicates that ZVNBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FXH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ZVNBX | FXH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.56% | 7.02% | +2.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.77% | 11.54% | +7.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.75% | 19.22% | +10.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.78% | 16.45% | +19.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.31% | 18.46% | +13.85% |