ZVNBX vs. DFUS

Last updated Jul 31, 2026

ZVNBX (Zevenbergen Growth Fund) and DFUS (Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF) are both funds - ZVNBX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Zevenbergen, while DFUS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional. Their correlation of 0.81 means they have usually moved in the same direction. ZVNBX charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for DFUS.

Performance

ZVNBX vs. DFUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Zevenbergen Growth Fund (ZVNBX) and Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF (DFUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ZVNBX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

DFUS

• 1D: 1.77%
• 1M: -1.11%
• 6M: 7.63%
• YTD: 9.77%
• 1Y: 18.82%
• 3Y*: 18.87%
• 5Y*: 12.33%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.80%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DFUS Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF	$51.24M	$61.54M	$61.43M

ZVNBX vs. DFUS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ZVNBX Zevenbergen Growth Fund	-0.07%	9.93%	34.10%	63.92%	-54.79%	-0.86%
DFUS Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF	9.77%	17.46%	24.34%	26.36%	-18.34%	12.07%

Correlation

The correlation between ZVNBX and DFUS is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.75
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.82
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2021	0.81

The correlation between ZVNBX and DFUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ZVNBX vs. DFUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ZVNBX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DFUS

DFUS Risk / Return Rank: 66
DFUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
DFUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
DFUS Omega Ratio Rank: 62
DFUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
DFUS Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ZVNBX vs. DFUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zevenbergen Growth Fund (ZVNBX) and Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF (DFUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ZVNBX	DFUS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.43	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.00	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.25	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.11	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	9.02	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	ZVNBX	DFUS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-24.62%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.96%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.44%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.62%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-1.98%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-5.69%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.09%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ZVNBX	DFUS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.64%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	10.41%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	13.26%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	17.30%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	17.16%	—

ZVNBX vs. DFUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZVNBX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than DFUS's 0.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

ZVNBX vs. DFUS - Dividend Comparison

ZVNBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, more than DFUS's 0.87% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
DFUS Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF	0.87%	0.88%	1.04%	1.33%	1.48%	0.85%	0.00%
ZVNBX Zevenbergen Growth Fund	1.27%	1.26%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	1.95%	0.07%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ZVNBX and DFUS in my portfolio?

ZVNBX and DFUS have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.