ZVNBX vs. BLUEX

Last updated Jul 4, 2026

ZVNBX (Zevenbergen Growth Fund) and BLUEX (AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, ZVNBX returned 16.57%/yr vs 9.79%/yr for BLUEX. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ZVNBX charges 1.30%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for BLUEX.

Performance

ZVNBX vs. BLUEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Zevenbergen Growth Fund (ZVNBX) and AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund (BLUEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZVNBX achieves a -0.07% return, which is significantly higher than BLUEX's -3.29% return. Over the past 10 years, ZVNBX has outperformed BLUEX with an annualized return of 16.57%, while BLUEX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.79% annualized return.

ZVNBX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -3.96%
• 6M: 0.27%
• YTD: -0.07%
• 1Y: -1.27%
• 3Y*: 17.10%
• 5Y*: 0.72%
• 10Y*: 16.57%

BLUEX

• 1D: 2.05%
• 1M: 4.53%
• 6M: -3.34%
• YTD: -3.29%
• 1Y: -4.51%
• 3Y*: 4.05%
• 5Y*: 0.74%
• 10Y*: 9.79%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZVNBX vs. BLUEX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ZVNBX Zevenbergen Growth Fund	-0.07%	9.93%	34.10%	63.92%	-54.79%	-9.19%	123.87%	37.73%	5.88%	33.71%
BLUEX AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund	-3.29%	4.45%	7.24%	14.35%	-14.30%	3.22%	34.74%	35.34%	-4.91%	27.86%

Correlation

The correlation between ZVNBX and BLUEX is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.43
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.55
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 2, 2015	0.69

Over the past year, the correlation between ZVNBX and BLUEX has dropped to 0.36 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

ZVNBX vs. BLUEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZVNBX

ZVNBX Risk / Return Rank: 4
ZVNBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
ZVNBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
ZVNBX Omega Ratio Rank: 5
ZVNBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
ZVNBX Martin Ratio Rank: 4

BLUEX

BLUEX Risk / Return Rank: 1
BLUEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
BLUEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
BLUEX Omega Ratio Rank: 2
BLUEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
BLUEX Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZVNBX vs. BLUEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zevenbergen Growth Fund (ZVNBX) and AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund (BLUEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ZVNBX	BLUEX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.14	-0.42	+0.56
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.35	-0.53	+0.88
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	0.94	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.13	-0.37	+0.49
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.32	-0.82	+1.14

ZVNBX vs. BLUEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZVNBX Sharpe Ratio is 0.14, which is higher than the BLUEX Sharpe Ratio of -0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZVNBX and BLUEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ZVNBX vs. BLUEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZVNBX drawdown since its inception was -66.30%, which is greater than BLUEX's maximum drawdown of -54.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZVNBX and BLUEX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZVNBX	BLUEX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.30%	-54.27%	-12.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.79%	-12.19%	-14.60%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.14%	-12.19%	-17.95%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-63.28%	-21.87%	-41.41%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-66.30%	-29.06%	-37.24%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.70%	-5.30%	-10.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.80%	-13.35%	-6.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.56%	5.39%	+5.17%

Volatility

ZVNBX vs. BLUEX - Volatility Comparison

Zevenbergen Growth Fund (ZVNBX) has a higher volatility of 8.80% compared to AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund (BLUEX) at 4.45%. This indicates that ZVNBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLUEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZVNBX	BLUEX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.80%	4.45%	+4.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.12%	8.74%	+10.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.04%	10.72%	+13.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.57%	10.78%	+24.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.43%	16.55%	+15.88%

ZVNBX vs. BLUEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZVNBX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than BLUEX's 1.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

ZVNBX vs. BLUEX - Dividend Comparison

ZVNBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, more than BLUEX's 0.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BLUEX AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund	0.32%	0.31%	0.29%	0.03%	11.84%	27.20%	25.43%	13.71%	13.40%	0.00%	0.00%	0.24%
ZVNBX Zevenbergen Growth Fund	1.27%	1.26%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	1.95%	0.07%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ZVNBX and BLUEX in my portfolio?

ZVNBX and BLUEX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ZVNBX or BLUEX?

ZVNBX has higher volatility (8.80%) compared to BLUEX (4.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZVNBX dropped -66.30% vs BLUEX's -54.27%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ZVNBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.14 vs -0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.