BLUEX vs. FNCMX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

BLUEX (AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund) and FNCMX (Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, BLUEX returned 9.68%/yr vs 19.35%/yr for FNCMX. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BLUEX charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for FNCMX.

Performance

BLUEX vs. FNCMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund (BLUEX) and Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLUEX achieves a -7.33% return, which is significantly lower than FNCMX's 10.44% return. Over the past 10 years, BLUEX has underperformed FNCMX with an annualized return of 9.68%, while FNCMX has yielded a comparatively higher 19.35% annualized return.

BLUEX

• 1D: 0.76%
• 1M: -0.61%
• YTD: -7.33%
• 6M: -7.40%
• 1Y: -7.16%
• 3Y*: 2.92%
• 5Y*: -0.16%
• 10Y*: 9.68%

FNCMX

• 1D: -2.22%
• 1M: -2.76%
• YTD: 10.44%
• 6M: 8.70%
• 1Y: 29.32%
• 3Y*: 24.73%
• 5Y*: 13.17%
• 10Y*: 19.35%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLUEX vs. FNCMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BLUEX AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund	-7.33%	4.45%	7.24%	14.35%	-14.30%	3.22%	34.74%	35.34%	-4.91%	27.86%
FNCMX Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund	10.44%	21.11%	29.48%	45.13%	-32.40%	22.21%	44.57%	36.63%	-3.07%	28.35%

Correlation

The correlation between BLUEX and FNCMX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.34
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.45
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2003	0.82

Over the past year, the correlation between BLUEX and FNCMX has dropped to 0.34 - well below their long-term average of 0.82, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

BLUEX vs. FNCMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLUEX

BLUEX Risk / Return Rank: 1
BLUEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
BLUEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
BLUEX Omega Ratio Rank: 1
BLUEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
BLUEX Martin Ratio Rank: 1

FNCMX

FNCMX Risk / Return Rank: 42
FNCMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
FNCMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
FNCMX Omega Ratio Rank: 40
FNCMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
FNCMX Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLUEX vs. FNCMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund (BLUEX) and Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BLUEX	FNCMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.61	1.78	-2.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.80	2.38	-3.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.91	1.31	-0.40
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.53	2.41	-2.93
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.22	9.10	-10.32

BLUEX vs. FNCMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BLUEX Sharpe Ratio is -0.61, which is lower than the FNCMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLUEX and FNCMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BLUEX vs. FNCMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLUEX drawdown since its inception was -54.27%, roughly equal to the maximum FNCMX drawdown of -55.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLUEX and FNCMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BLUEX	FNCMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.27%	-55.08%	+0.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.19%	-13.01%	+0.82%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.19%	-24.20%	+12.01%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.87%	-35.64%	+13.77%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-29.06%	-35.64%	+6.58%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.26%	-5.47%	-3.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.36%	-7.85%	-5.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.23%	3.43%	+1.80%

Volatility

BLUEX vs. FNCMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund (BLUEX) is 3.97%, while Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX) has a volatility of 7.69%. This indicates that BLUEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNCMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BLUEX	FNCMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.97%	7.69%	-3.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.31%	13.87%	-5.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.47%	17.60%	-7.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.72%	22.68%	-11.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.57%	22.12%	-5.55%

BLUEX vs. FNCMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLUEX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than FNCMX's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

BLUEX vs. FNCMX - Dividend Comparison

BLUEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than FNCMX's 0.47% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BLUEX AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund	0.34%	0.31%	0.29%	0.03%	11.84%	27.20%	25.43%	13.71%	13.40%	0.00%	0.00%	0.24%
FNCMX Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund	0.47%	0.51%	0.61%	0.67%	0.88%	0.47%	0.67%	4.41%	1.93%	0.03%	1.01%	1.50%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BLUEX and FNCMX in my portfolio?

BLUEX and FNCMX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BLUEX or FNCMX?

FNCMX has higher volatility (7.69%) compared to BLUEX (3.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLUEX dropped -54.27% vs FNCMX's -55.08%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNCMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.