PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZTS vs. TFLO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZTS vs. TFLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Zoetis Inc. (ZTS) and iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF (TFLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZTS achieves a -39.56% return, which is significantly lower than TFLO's 2.02% return. Over the past 10 years, ZTS has outperformed TFLO with an annualized return of 5.10%, while TFLO has yielded a comparatively lower 2.40% annualized return.


ZTS

1D
-0.22%
1M
-5.25%
6M
-39.32%
YTD
-39.56%
1Y
-50.59%
3Y*
-23.14%
5Y*
-17.00%
10Y*
5.10%

TFLO

1D
0.02%
1M
0.31%
6M
1.92%
YTD
2.02%
1Y
3.94%
3Y*
4.67%
5Y*
3.72%
10Y*
2.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZTS vs. TFLO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZTS
Zoetis Inc.
-39.56%-21.75%-16.63%35.91%-39.51%48.26%25.76%55.71%19.45%35.55%
TFLO
iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF
2.02%4.22%5.34%5.12%1.99%-0.02%0.43%2.04%1.76%1.01%

Correlation

The correlation between ZTS and TFLO is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.04

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2014

-0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZTS vs. TFLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZTS
ZTS Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
ZTS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZTS Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZTS Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
ZTS Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZTS Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

TFLO
TFLO Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
TFLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TFLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
TFLO Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
TFLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
TFLO Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZTS vs. TFLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zoetis Inc. (ZTS) and iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF (TFLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ZTSTFLODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-15.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-49.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.68

12.34

-11.65

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.95

199.41

-200.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.92

766.50

-768.42

ZTS vs. TFLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZTS Sharpe Ratio is -1.41, which is lower than the TFLO Sharpe Ratio of 13.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZTS and TFLO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZTS vs. TFLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZTS drawdown since its inception was -69.48%, which is greater than TFLO's maximum drawdown of -5.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZTS and TFLO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZTSTFLODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.48%

-5.01%

-64.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.60%

-0.02%

-53.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-62.99%

-0.04%

-62.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-69.48%

-0.13%

-69.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.48%

-0.16%

-69.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-67.98%

0.00%

-67.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.14%

-0.10%

-15.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.35%

0.01%

+26.34%

Volatility

ZTS vs. TFLO - Volatility Comparison

Zoetis Inc. (ZTS) has a higher volatility of 8.62% compared to iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF (TFLO) at 0.11%. This indicates that ZTS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TFLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZTSTFLODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.62%

0.11%

+8.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.91%

0.21%

+31.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.14%

0.29%

+35.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.96%

0.36%

+28.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.16%

0.45%

+26.71%

Dividends

ZTS vs. TFLO - Dividend Comparison

ZTS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.73%, less than TFLO's 3.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TFLO
iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF
3.84%4.16%5.21%4.88%1.68%0.00%0.36%2.08%1.65%0.86%0.31%0.15%
ZTS
Zoetis Inc.
2.73%1.59%1.06%0.76%0.89%0.41%0.48%0.50%0.59%0.58%0.71%0.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZTS and TFLO have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ZTS has higher volatility (8.62%) compared to TFLO (0.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZTS dropped -69.48% vs TFLO's -5.01%.

TFLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (13.67 vs -1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZTS and TFLO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer