PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZTRE vs. IVES
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZTRE vs. IVES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in F/M 3-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTRE) and Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF (IVES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZTRE achieves a 0.47% return, which is significantly lower than IVES's 18.82% return.


ZTRE

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.25%
YTD
0.47%
6M
0.83%
1Y
3.84%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IVES

1D
-1.24%
1M
0.83%
YTD
18.82%
6M
16.32%
1Y
45.84%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZTRE vs. IVES - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ZTRE and IVES is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2025

0.20

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZTRE vs. IVES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZTRE
ZTRE Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
ZTRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZTRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZTRE Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
ZTRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZTRE Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

IVES
IVES Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
IVES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVES Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVES Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
IVES Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVES Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZTRE vs. IVES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F/M 3-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTRE) and Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF (IVES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ZTREIVESDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.29

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.66

2.03

+0.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.60

5.57

+5.03

ZTRE vs. IVES - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZTRE Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is comparable to the IVES Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZTRE and IVES, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZTRE vs. IVES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZTRE drawdown since its inception was -1.45%, smaller than the maximum IVES drawdown of -22.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZTRE and IVES.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZTREIVESDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.45%

-22.64%

+21.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.45%

-22.64%

+21.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.34%

-9.99%

+9.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.20%

-5.80%

+5.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.36%

8.25%

-7.89%

Volatility

ZTRE vs. IVES - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for F/M 3-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTRE) is 0.59%, while Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF (IVES) has a volatility of 11.55%. This indicates that ZTRE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IVES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZTREIVESDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.59%

11.55%

-10.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.48%

21.29%

-19.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.90%

27.03%

-25.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.11%

26.59%

-24.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.11%

26.59%

-24.48%

ZTRE vs. IVES - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZTRE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than IVES's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZTRE vs. IVES - Dividend Comparison

ZTRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.22%, more than IVES's 0.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
IVES
Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF
0.35%0.41%0.00%
ZTRE
F/M 3-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
4.22%4.37%0.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZTRE and IVES have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IVES has higher volatility (11.55%) compared to ZTRE (0.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZTRE dropped -1.45% vs IVES's -22.64%.

On 1-year performance, IVES leads with 45.84% vs 3.84% for ZTRE. On fees, ZTRE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, ZTRE has been the lower-risk option at 0.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IVES has performed better with a 45.84% return vs 3.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ZTRE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for IVES.

ZTRE has the higher dividend yield at 4.22%, compared with 0.35% for IVES.

ZTRE is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while IVES is Technology Equities. ZTRE tracks ICE 3-Year US Target Maturity Corporate Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while IVES tracks Solactive Wedbush Artificial Intelligence Index. They also come from different issuers: F/m and Wedbush. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for ZTRE and 0.75% for IVES.

ZTRE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZTRE and IVES

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer