PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IVES vs. AIPO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IVES vs. AIPO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF (IVES) and Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF (AIPO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVES achieves a 18.82% return, which is significantly lower than AIPO's 57.19% return.


IVES

1D
-1.24%
1M
0.83%
YTD
18.82%
6M
16.32%
1Y
45.84%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AIPO

1D
2.26%
1M
7.45%
YTD
57.19%
6M
53.73%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVES vs. AIPO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IVES and AIPO is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025

0.73

IVES vs. AIPO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IVES
AIPO

Technology

71.8%
18.9%

Consumer Cyclical

11.0%

-

Communication Services

10.9%
0.8%

Industrials

3.1%
46.4%

Financial Services

1.9%
5.3%

Utilities

1.3%
21.2%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

6.1%

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

1.0%

Technology

IVES
71.8%
AIPO
18.9%

Consumer Cyclical

IVES
11.0%
AIPO

-

Communication Services

IVES
10.9%
AIPO
0.8%

Industrials

IVES
3.1%
AIPO
46.4%

Financial Services

IVES
1.9%
AIPO
5.3%

Utilities

IVES
1.3%
AIPO
21.2%

Basic Materials

IVES

-

AIPO

-

Consumer Defensive

IVES

-

AIPO

-

Energy

IVES

-

AIPO
6.1%

Healthcare

IVES

-

AIPO

-

Real Estate

IVES

-

AIPO
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IVES vs. AIPO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVES
IVES Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
IVES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVES Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVES Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
IVES Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVES Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

AIPO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVES vs. AIPO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF (IVES) and Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF (AIPO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IVESAIPODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.57

IVES vs. AIPO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IVES vs. AIPO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVES drawdown since its inception was -22.64%, which is greater than AIPO's maximum drawdown of -17.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVES and AIPO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IVESAIPODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.64%

-17.31%

-5.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.99%

0.00%

-9.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.80%

-4.44%

-1.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.25%

Volatility

IVES vs. AIPO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IVESAIPODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.03%

35.26%

-8.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.59%

35.26%

-8.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.59%

35.26%

-8.67%

IVES vs. AIPO - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVES has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than AIPO's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

IVES vs. AIPO - Dividend Comparison

IVES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, more than AIPO's 0.01% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


IVES and AIPO have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AIPO is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AIPO is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for IVES.

IVES has the higher dividend yield at 0.35%, compared with 0.01% for AIPO.

IVES is categorized as Technology Equities, while AIPO is Building & Construction. IVES tracks Solactive Wedbush Artificial Intelligence Index, while AIPO tracks MarketVector™ US Listed AI and Power Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Wedbush and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for IVES and 0.69% for AIPO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IVES and AIPO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer