PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZTRE vs. GSG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZTRE vs. GSG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in F/M 3-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTRE) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZTRE achieves a 0.47% return, which is significantly lower than GSG's 42.58% return.


ZTRE

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.22%
YTD
0.47%
6M
0.89%
1Y
4.21%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GSG

1D
0.77%
1M
-4.83%
YTD
42.58%
6M
41.06%
1Y
51.52%
3Y*
19.31%
5Y*
15.74%
10Y*
7.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZTRE vs. GSG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ZTRE and GSG is -0.37, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2024

-0.27

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZTRE vs. GSG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZTRE
ZTRE Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
ZTRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZTRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZTRE Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
ZTRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZTRE Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

GSG
GSG Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
GSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSG Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
GSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSG Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZTRE vs. GSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F/M 3-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTRE) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZTREGSGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.40

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.91

5.47

-2.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.83

14.39

-2.57

ZTRE vs. GSG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZTRE Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the GSG Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZTRE and GSG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZTREGSGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.24

2.26

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.46

-0.09

+2.54

Drawdowns

ZTRE vs. GSG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZTRE drawdown since its inception was -1.45%, smaller than the maximum GSG drawdown of -89.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZTRE and GSG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZTREGSGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.45%

-89.62%

+88.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.45%

-9.46%

+8.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.34%

-56.95%

+56.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.20%

-63.71%

+63.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.36%

3.59%

-3.23%

Volatility

ZTRE vs. GSG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for F/M 3-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTRE) is 0.62%, while iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG) has a volatility of 7.65%. This indicates that ZTRE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZTREGSGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.62%

7.65%

-7.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.41%

20.42%

-19.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.89%

22.95%

-21.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.10%

22.61%

-20.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.10%

22.03%

-19.93%

ZTRE vs. GSG - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZTRE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than GSG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZTRE vs. GSG - Dividend Comparison

ZTRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.22%, while GSG has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


ZTRE and GSG have a correlation of -0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSG has higher volatility (7.65%) compared to ZTRE (0.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZTRE dropped -1.45% vs GSG's -89.62%.

On 1-year performance, GSG leads with 51.52% vs 4.21% for ZTRE. On fees, ZTRE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, ZTRE has been the lower-risk option at 0.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GSG has performed better with a 51.52% return vs 4.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ZTRE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GSG.

ZTRE has the higher dividend yield at 4.22%, compared with 0.00% for GSG.

ZTRE is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while GSG is Commodities. ZTRE tracks ICE 3-Year US Target Maturity Corporate Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while GSG tracks S&P GSCI Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: F/m and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for ZTRE and 0.75% for GSG.

GSG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZTRE and GSG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer