PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZTR vs. EIT-UN.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ZTR vs. EIT-UN.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Total Return Fund (ZTR) and Canoe EIT Income Fund (EIT-UN.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ZTR vs. EIT-UN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZTR
Virtus Total Return Fund
9.60%18.63%18.31%-3.21%-21.32%20.57%-11.78%44.65%-24.86%29.52%
EIT-UN.TO
Canoe EIT Income Fund
6.40%17.17%17.88%8.35%3.10%4,195.80%2,015.45%18.06%-10.61%18.11%
Different Trading Currencies

ZTR is traded in USD, while EIT-UN.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the EIT-UN.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZTR achieves a 9.60% return, which is significantly higher than EIT-UN.TO's 7.17% return. Over the past 10 years, ZTR has underperformed EIT-UN.TO with an annualized return of 6.63%, while EIT-UN.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 116.49% annualized return.


ZTR

1D
1.96%
1M
-4.23%
YTD
9.60%
6M
9.40%
1Y
23.96%
3Y*
13.24%
5Y*
5.56%
10Y*
6.63%

EIT-UN.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
-3.64%
YTD
7.17%
6M
12.75%
1Y
23.32%
3Y*
18.27%
5Y*
126.47%
10Y*
116.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ZTR vs. EIT-UN.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZTR has a 3.77% expense ratio, which is higher than EIT-UN.TO's 1.10% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ZTR vs. EIT-UN.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZTR
ZTR Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
ZTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZTR Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
ZTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZTR Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

EIT-UN.TO
EIT-UN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
EIT-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIT-UN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIT-UN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
EIT-UN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIT-UN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZTR vs. EIT-UN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Total Return Fund (ZTR) and Canoe EIT Income Fund (EIT-UN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZTREIT-UN.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.61

1.65

-0.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.22

2.59

-0.37

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.36

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.18

2.80

-0.62

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.41

11.41

-1.99

ZTR vs. EIT-UN.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZTR Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the EIT-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZTR and EIT-UN.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZTREIT-UN.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.61

1.65

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

0.11

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

0.12

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.08

+0.23

Correlation

The correlation between ZTR and EIT-UN.TO is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

ZTR vs. EIT-UN.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.89%, more than EIT-UN.TO's 7.22% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ZTR
Virtus Total Return Fund
8.89%9.52%10.24%15.25%15.88%10.96%13.72%11.89%15.18%13.85%10.58%9.11%
EIT-UN.TO
Canoe EIT Income Fund
7.22%7.64%7.90%9.29%8.97%104.98%108.64%11.53%11.62%11.01%10.06%10.71%

Drawdowns

ZTR vs. EIT-UN.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZTR drawdown since its inception was -57.25%, roughly equal to the maximum EIT-UN.TO drawdown of -54.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZTR and EIT-UN.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ZTREIT-UN.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.25%

-100.11%

+42.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.17%

-8.68%

-2.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.64%

-15.57%

-27.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.25%

-50.36%

-6.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.23%

-100.00%

+95.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.38%

-99.24%

+89.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.59%

1.78%

+0.81%

Volatility

ZTR vs. EIT-UN.TO - Volatility Comparison

Virtus Total Return Fund (ZTR) and Canoe EIT Income Fund (EIT-UN.TO) have volatilities of 4.85% and 4.95%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ZTREIT-UN.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.85%

4.95%

-0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.53%

7.83%

+0.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.92%

14.23%

+0.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.87%

1,192.45%

-1,175.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.58%

1,019.16%

-997.58%