EIT-UN.TO vs. CLSA.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Canoe EIT Income Fund (EIT-UN.TO) and Brompton Split Corp. Enhanced Equity Income ETF (CLSA.TO).

EIT-UN.TO is an actively managed fund by Canoe. It was launched on Aug 6, 1997. CLSA.TO is an actively managed fund by Brompton Funds. It was launched on Mar 20, 2025.

Performance

EIT-UN.TO vs. CLSA.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Canoe EIT Income Fund (EIT-UN.TO) and Brompton Split Corp. Enhanced Equity Income ETF (CLSA.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

EIT-UN.TO vs. CLSA.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EIT-UN.TO Canoe EIT Income Fund	8.56%	9.21%
CLSA.TO Brompton Split Corp. Enhanced Equity Income ETF	-2.42%	56.35%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EIT-UN.TO achieves a 8.56% return, which is significantly higher than CLSA.TO's -2.42% return.

EIT-UN.TO

• 1D: 2.51%
• 1M: -1.96%
• YTD: 8.56%
• 6M: 12.25%
• 1Y: 20.06%
• 3Y*: 19.39%
• 5Y*: 131.17%
• 10Y*: 117.96%

CLSA.TO

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: -7.65%
• YTD: -2.42%
• 6M: 14.55%
• 1Y: 53.49%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EIT-UN.TO vs. CLSA.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EIT-UN.TO has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than CLSA.TO's 0.60% expense ratio.

EIT-UN.TO

Canoe EIT Income Fund

CLSA.TO

Brompton Split Corp. Enhanced Equity Income ETF

Return for Risk

EIT-UN.TO vs. CLSA.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EIT-UN.TO

EIT-UN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 88
EIT-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
EIT-UN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
EIT-UN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 86
EIT-UN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
EIT-UN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 93

CLSA.TO

CLSA.TO Risk / Return Rank: 97
CLSA.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
CLSA.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
CLSA.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 97
CLSA.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
CLSA.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EIT-UN.TO vs. CLSA.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Canoe EIT Income Fund (EIT-UN.TO) and Brompton Split Corp. Enhanced Equity Income ETF (CLSA.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EIT-UN.TO	CLSA.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.59	3.16	-1.57
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.34	3.73	-1.39
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.63	-0.27
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.37	4.90	-2.54
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.62	19.65	-8.03
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EIT-UN.TO vs. CLSA.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EIT-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is lower than the CLSA.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EIT-UN.TO and CLSA.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EIT-UN.TO	CLSA.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.59	3.16	-1.57
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.11	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.12	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	3.02	—

Correlation

The correlation between EIT-UN.TO and CLSA.TO is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

EIT-UN.TO vs. CLSA.TO - Dividend Comparison

EIT-UN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.16%, less than CLSA.TO's 10.32% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EIT-UN.TO Canoe EIT Income Fund	7.16%	7.64%	7.90%	9.29%	8.97%	104.98%	108.64%	11.53%	11.62%	11.01%	10.06%	10.71%
CLSA.TO Brompton Split Corp. Enhanced Equity Income ETF	10.32%	7.99%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

EIT-UN.TO vs. CLSA.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EIT-UN.TO drawdown since its inception was -100.11%, which is greater than CLSA.TO's maximum drawdown of -11.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIT-UN.TO and CLSA.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	EIT-UN.TO	CLSA.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-100.11%	-11.73%	-88.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.68%	-10.78%	+2.10%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.57%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-50.36%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-100.00%	-8.62%	-91.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-99.24%	-1.45%	-97.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.77%	2.69%	-0.92%

Volatility

EIT-UN.TO vs. CLSA.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Canoe EIT Income Fund (EIT-UN.TO) is 4.90%, while Brompton Split Corp. Enhanced Equity Income ETF (CLSA.TO) has a volatility of 9.01%. This indicates that EIT-UN.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLSA.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EIT-UN.TO	CLSA.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.90%	9.01%	-4.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.16%	11.96%	-4.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.64%	17.02%	-4.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1,193.82%	17.01%	+1,176.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1,020.18%	17.01%	+1,003.17%