LFSC vs. SPIT
LFSC (F/m Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETF) and SPIT (F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LFSC is a Health & Biotech Equities fund actively managed by F/m Investments, while SPIT is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by F/m Investments. Both are actively managed. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LFSC charges 0.54%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for SPIT.
Performance
LFSC vs. SPIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LFSC achieves a 26.42% return, which is significantly lower than SPIT's 29.78% return.
LFSC
- 1D
- -2.29%
- 1M
- 15.25%
- 6M
- 26.72%
- YTD
- 26.42%
- 1Y
- 84.55%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPIT
- 1D
- -1.32%
- 1M
- 2.29%
- 6M
- 21.58%
- YTD
- 29.78%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LFSC vs. SPIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LFSC F/m Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETF | 26.42% | 21.85% |
SPIT F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF | 29.78% | 5.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between LFSC and SPIT is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2025 | 0.62 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LFSC vs. SPIT — Risk / Return Rank
LFSC
SPIT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
LFSC vs. SPIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F/m Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETF (LFSC) and F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF (SPIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LFSC | SPIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.99 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.13 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LFSC vs. SPIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LFSC drawdown since its inception was -29.74%, which is greater than SPIT's maximum drawdown of -12.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFSC and SPIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LFSC | SPIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.74% | -12.49% | -17.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.25% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.29% | -3.59% | +1.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.37% | -2.50% | -4.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.74% | — | — |
Volatility
LFSC vs. SPIT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LFSC | SPIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.83% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.67% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.59% | 26.35% | +0.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.72% | 26.35% | +2.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.72% | 26.35% | +2.37% |
LFSC vs. SPIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
LFSC has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than SPIT's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
LFSC vs. SPIT - Dividend Comparison
LFSC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.53%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
LFSC F/m Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPIT F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF | 5.53% | 7.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LFSC and SPIT have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LFSC is cheaper at 0.54% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LFSC is cheaper with a 0.54% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for SPIT.
SPIT has the higher dividend yield at 5.53%, compared with 0.00% for LFSC.
LFSC is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while SPIT is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.54% for LFSC and 0.89% for SPIT.
Find the right allocation for LFSC and SPIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer