PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZTOP vs. HYHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZTOP vs. HYHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in F/m High Yield 100 ETF (ZTOP) and ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged (HYHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZTOP achieves a 1.72% return, which is significantly lower than HYHG's 3.79% return.


ZTOP

1D
-0.15%
1M
0.35%
YTD
1.72%
6M
2.15%
1Y
6.01%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HYHG

1D
0.18%
1M
0.64%
YTD
3.79%
6M
4.48%
1Y
8.13%
3Y*
9.93%
5Y*
7.03%
10Y*
6.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZTOP vs. HYHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
ZTOP
F/m High Yield 100 ETF
1.72%8.06%
HYHG
ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged
3.79%7.54%

Correlation

The correlation between ZTOP and HYHG is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2025

0.34

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZTOP vs. HYHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZTOP
ZTOP Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
ZTOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZTOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZTOP Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
ZTOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZTOP Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

HYHG
HYHG Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
HYHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYHG Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
HYHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYHG Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZTOP vs. HYHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F/m High Yield 100 ETF (ZTOP) and ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged (HYHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ZTOPHYHGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.26

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.39

4.04

-1.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.83

13.51

-2.68

ZTOP vs. HYHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZTOP Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the HYHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZTOP and HYHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZTOP vs. HYHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZTOP drawdown since its inception was -2.52%, smaller than the maximum HYHG drawdown of -25.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZTOP and HYHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZTOPHYHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.52%

-25.71%

+23.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.52%

-2.02%

-0.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.25%

0.00%

-0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.29%

-3.03%

+2.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.56%

0.60%

-0.04%

Volatility

ZTOP vs. HYHG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for F/m High Yield 100 ETF (ZTOP) is 0.83%, while ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged (HYHG) has a volatility of 1.46%. This indicates that ZTOP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZTOPHYHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.83%

1.46%

-0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.66%

4.36%

-1.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.33%

5.58%

-2.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.47%

8.17%

-4.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.47%

9.13%

-5.66%

ZTOP vs. HYHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZTOP has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than HYHG's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZTOP vs. HYHG - Dividend Comparison

ZTOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.27%, less than HYHG's 6.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HYHG
ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged
6.73%6.97%6.57%6.07%5.58%4.54%5.21%6.06%6.45%5.57%5.37%6.37%
ZTOP
F/m High Yield 100 ETF
6.27%4.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZTOP and HYHG have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HYHG has higher volatility (1.46%) compared to ZTOP (0.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZTOP dropped -2.52% vs HYHG's -25.71%.

On 1-year performance, HYHG leads with 8.13% vs 6.01% for ZTOP. On fees, ZTOP is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, ZTOP has been the lower-risk option at 0.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, HYHG has performed better with a 8.13% return vs 6.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ZTOP is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HYHG.

HYHG has the higher dividend yield at 6.73%, compared with 6.27% for ZTOP.

ZTOP tracks Bloomberg U.S. High Yield Top 100 Quality Select Equal Weighted Index, while HYHG tracks Citi High Yield (Treasury Rate-Hedged) Index. They also come from different issuers: F/m Investments and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for ZTOP and 0.50% for HYHG.

ZTOP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZTOP and HYHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer