ZTEN vs. CERY

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

ZTEN (F/M 10-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF) and CERY (SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZTEN is a Long-Term Bond fund tracking the ICE 10-Year US Target Maturity Corporate Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while CERY is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ZTEN returned 5.79% vs 26.93% for CERY. At a correlation of -0.16, they often move in opposite directions. ZTEN charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for CERY.

Performance

ZTEN vs. CERY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in F/M 10-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTEN) and SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (CERY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZTEN achieves a 0.90% return, which is significantly lower than CERY's 15.55% return.

ZTEN

• 1D: 0.48%
• 1M: 1.30%
• YTD: 0.90%
• 6M: 0.68%
• 1Y: 5.79%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CERY

• 1D: -2.16%
• 1M: -11.45%
• YTD: 15.55%
• 6M: 13.60%
• 1Y: 26.93%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZTEN vs. CERY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ZTEN F/M 10-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF	0.90%	9.15%	0.29%
CERY SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF	15.55%	15.68%	1.98%

Correlation

The correlation between ZTEN and CERY is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.22
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2024	-0.16

Return for Risk

ZTEN vs. CERY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZTEN

ZTEN Risk / Return Rank: 37
ZTEN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
ZTEN Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
ZTEN Omega Ratio Rank: 34
ZTEN Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
ZTEN Martin Ratio Rank: 39

CERY

CERY Risk / Return Rank: 54
CERY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
CERY Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
CERY Omega Ratio Rank: 55
CERY Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
CERY Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZTEN vs. CERY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F/M 10-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTEN) and SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (CERY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ZTEN	CERY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.17	1.74	-0.57
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.72	2.33	-0.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.30	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.75	1.89	-0.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.44	9.35	-3.91

ZTEN vs. CERY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZTEN Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is lower than the CERY Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZTEN and CERY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ZTEN vs. CERY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZTEN drawdown since its inception was -3.43%, smaller than the maximum CERY drawdown of -14.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZTEN and CERY.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZTEN	CERY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.43%	-14.33%	+10.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.32%	-14.33%	+11.01%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.73%	-14.33%	+13.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.80%	-2.32%	+1.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.07%	2.89%	-1.82%

Volatility

ZTEN vs. CERY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for F/M 10-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTEN) is 1.46%, while SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (CERY) has a volatility of 4.01%. This indicates that ZTEN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CERY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZTEN	CERY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.46%	4.01%	-2.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.91%	13.81%	-9.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.99%	15.66%	-10.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.78%	14.82%	-9.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.78%	14.82%	-9.04%

ZTEN vs. CERY - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZTEN has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than CERY's 0.28% expense ratio.

Dividends

ZTEN vs. CERY - Dividend Comparison

ZTEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.04%, more than CERY's 4.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CERY SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF	4.32%	4.99%	0.52%
ZTEN F/M 10-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF	5.04%	5.16%	0.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ZTEN and CERY in my portfolio?

ZTEN and CERY have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ZTEN or CERY?

CERY has higher volatility (4.01%) compared to ZTEN (1.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZTEN dropped -3.43% vs CERY's -14.33%.

Which ETF is better, ZTEN or CERY?

On 1-year performance, CERY leads with 26.93% vs 5.79% for ZTEN. On fees, ZTEN is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, ZTEN has been the lower-risk option at 1.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ZTEN or CERY?

Over the 1-year period, CERY has performed better with a 26.93% return vs 5.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ZTEN or CERY?

ZTEN is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for CERY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ZTEN or CERY?

ZTEN has the higher dividend yield at 5.04%, compared with 4.32% for CERY.

What is the main difference between ZTEN and CERY?

ZTEN is categorized as Long-Term Bond, while CERY is Commodities. ZTEN tracks ICE 10-Year US Target Maturity Corporate Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while CERY tracks Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: F/m and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for ZTEN and 0.28% for CERY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CERY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.