ZTEN vs. ZTWO
ZTEN (F/M 10-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF) and ZTWO (F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZTEN is a Long-Term Bond fund tracking the ICE 10-Year US Target Maturity Corporate Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while ZTWO is a Short-Term Bond fund tracking the ICE 2-Year US Target Maturity Corporate Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ZTEN returned 6.32% vs 3.94% for ZTWO. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.15% expense ratio.
Performance
ZTEN vs. ZTWO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZTEN achieves a 0.33% return, which is significantly lower than ZTWO's 0.93% return.
ZTEN
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 0.33%
- 6M
- 0.40%
- 1Y
- 6.32%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZTWO
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 0.93%
- 6M
- 1.30%
- 1Y
- 3.94%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZTEN vs. ZTWO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ZTEN F/M 10-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 0.33% | 9.15% | 0.29% |
ZTWO F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 0.93% | 5.49% | 0.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZTEN and ZTWO is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2024 | 0.78 |
The correlation between ZTEN and ZTWO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZTEN vs. ZTWO — Risk / Return Rank
ZTEN
ZTWO
ZTEN vs. ZTWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F/M 10-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTEN) and F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZTEN | ZTWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.63 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.91 | 4.24 | -2.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.21 | 20.10 | -13.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZTEN | ZTWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.28 | 3.03 | -1.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.16 | 3.17 | -2.01 |
Drawdowns
ZTEN vs. ZTWO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZTEN drawdown since its inception was -3.43%, which is greater than ZTWO's maximum drawdown of -0.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZTEN and ZTWO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZTEN | ZTWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.43% | -0.93% | -2.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.32% | -0.93% | -2.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.30% | -0.07% | -1.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.79% | -0.10% | -0.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.02% | 0.20% | +0.82% |
Volatility
ZTEN vs. ZTWO - Volatility Comparison
F/M 10-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTEN) has a higher volatility of 1.60% compared to F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTWO) at 0.42%. This indicates that ZTEN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZTWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZTEN | ZTWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.60% | 0.42% | +1.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.77% | 0.97% | +2.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.99% | 1.31% | +3.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.79% | 1.49% | +4.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.79% | 1.49% | +4.30% |
ZTEN vs. ZTWO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both ZTEN and ZTWO have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ZTEN vs. ZTWO - Dividend Comparison
ZTEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.07%, more than ZTWO's 4.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
ZTEN F/M 10-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 5.07% | 5.16% | 0.44% |
ZTWO F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 4.12% | 4.31% | 0.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZTEN and ZTWO have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ZTEN has higher volatility (1.60%) compared to ZTWO (0.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZTEN dropped -3.43% vs ZTWO's -0.93%.
On 1-year performance, ZTEN leads with 6.32% vs 3.94% for ZTWO. Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. On volatility, ZTWO has been the lower-risk option at 0.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ZTEN has performed better with a 6.32% return vs 3.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ZTEN and ZTWO have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.
ZTEN has the higher dividend yield at 5.07%, compared with 4.12% for ZTWO.
ZTEN is categorized as Long-Term Bond, while ZTWO is Short-Term Bond. ZTEN tracks ICE 10-Year US Target Maturity Corporate Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while ZTWO tracks ICE 2-Year US Target Maturity Corporate Index - Benchmark TR Gross.
ZTWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.03 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ZTEN and ZTWO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer