PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZTAX vs. ARMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZTAX vs. ARMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in X-Square Municipal Income Tax Free ETF (ZTAX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZTAX achieves a 1.66% return, which is significantly lower than ARMG's 614.21% return.


ZTAX

1D
-1.45%
1M
1.21%
YTD
1.66%
6M
2.86%
1Y
6.26%
3Y*
4.27%
5Y*
10Y*

ARMG

1D
-4.39%
1M
19.42%
YTD
614.21%
6M
584.52%
1Y
190.30%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZTAX vs. ARMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ZTAX and ARMG is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2025

-0.12

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZTAX vs. ARMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZTAX
ZTAX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
ZTAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZTAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZTAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
ZTAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZTAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

ARMG
ARMG Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
ARMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARMG Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
ARMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARMG Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZTAX vs. ARMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for X-Square Municipal Income Tax Free ETF (ZTAX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ZTAXARMGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.31

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.57

2.81

-2.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.37

4.89

-3.52

ZTAX vs. ARMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZTAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.19, which is lower than the ARMG Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZTAX and ARMG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZTAX vs. ARMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZTAX drawdown since its inception was -15.33%, smaller than the maximum ARMG drawdown of -80.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZTAX and ARMG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZTAXARMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.33%

-80.28%

+64.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.99%

-68.13%

+57.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.74%

-34.85%

+24.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.82%

-51.73%

+44.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.57%

39.06%

-34.49%

Volatility

ZTAX vs. ARMG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for X-Square Municipal Income Tax Free ETF (ZTAX) is 19.64%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG) has a volatility of 71.64%. This indicates that ZTAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZTAXARMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.64%

71.64%

-52.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.28%

117.45%

-89.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.32%

141.44%

-109.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.90%

143.63%

-114.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.90%

143.63%

-114.73%

ZTAX vs. ARMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZTAX has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZTAX vs. ARMG - Dividend Comparison

ZTAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.50%, more than ARMG's 0.68% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
ARMG
Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF
0.68%4.86%0.00%0.00%
ZTAX
X-Square Municipal Income Tax Free ETF
4.50%4.58%4.55%2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZTAX and ARMG have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ARMG has higher volatility (71.64%) compared to ZTAX (19.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZTAX dropped -15.33% vs ARMG's -80.28%.

On 1-year performance, ARMG leads with 190.30% vs 6.26% for ZTAX. On fees, ARMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, ZTAX has been the lower-risk option at 19.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ARMG has performed better with a 190.30% return vs 6.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ARMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.14% for ZTAX.

ZTAX has the higher dividend yield at 4.50%, compared with 0.68% for ARMG.

ZTAX is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while ARMG is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: X-Square and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.14% for ZTAX and 0.75% for ARMG.

ARMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZTAX and ARMG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer