PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZTAX vs. IBMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ZTAX vs. IBMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in X-Square Municipal Income Tax Free ETF (ZTAX) and iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ZTAX vs. IBMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ZTAX
X-Square Municipal Income Tax Free ETF
0.90%-1.02%7.98%9.14%
IBMO
iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Muni Bond ETF
0.49%3.11%1.97%2.97%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZTAX achieves a 0.90% return, which is significantly higher than IBMO's 0.49% return.


ZTAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.80%
YTD
0.90%
6M
4.82%
1Y
5.47%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IBMO

1D
0.12%
1M
0.05%
YTD
0.49%
6M
1.32%
1Y
2.71%
3Y*
2.30%
5Y*
0.69%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ZTAX vs. IBMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZTAX has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than IBMO's 0.18% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ZTAX vs. IBMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZTAX
ZTAX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
ZTAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZTAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZTAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
ZTAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZTAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

IBMO
IBMO Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
IBMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBMO Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
IBMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBMO Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZTAX vs. IBMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for X-Square Municipal Income Tax Free ETF (ZTAX) and iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZTAXIBMODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.21

1.98

-1.76

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.49

2.80

-2.31

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.43

-0.35

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.52

2.93

-2.41

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.39

14.86

-13.47

ZTAX vs. IBMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZTAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.21, which is lower than the IBMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZTAX and IBMO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZTAXIBMODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

1.98

-1.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.40

-0.18

Correlation

The correlation between ZTAX and IBMO is -0.01. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

ZTAX vs. IBMO - Dividend Comparison

ZTAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.52%, more than IBMO's 2.38% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
ZTAX
X-Square Municipal Income Tax Free ETF
4.52%4.58%4.55%2.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IBMO
iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Muni Bond ETF
2.38%2.37%2.15%1.65%0.89%0.62%1.03%1.01%

Drawdowns

ZTAX vs. IBMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZTAX drawdown since its inception was -15.33%, roughly equal to the maximum IBMO drawdown of -14.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZTAX and IBMO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ZTAXIBMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.33%

-14.77%

-0.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.47%

-0.96%

-9.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.92%

-0.04%

-5.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.87%

-2.38%

-4.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.92%

0.19%

+3.73%

Volatility

ZTAX vs. IBMO - Volatility Comparison

X-Square Municipal Income Tax Free ETF (ZTAX) has a higher volatility of 9.47% compared to iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMO) at 0.40%. This indicates that ZTAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ZTAXIBMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.47%

0.40%

+9.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.05%

0.94%

+23.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.93%

1.38%

+24.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.25%

2.18%

+25.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.25%

4.57%

+22.68%