ZSCCX vs. SWSSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Zacks Small-Cap Core Fund (ZSCCX) and Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares (SWSSX).
ZSCCX is managed by Zacks. It was launched on Jun 30, 2011. SWSSX is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Index. It was launched on May 19, 1997.
Performance
ZSCCX vs. SWSSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ZSCCX vs. SWSSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZSCCX Zacks Small-Cap Core Fund | -1.81% | 10.25% | 27.77% | 17.94% | -11.84% | 32.60% | -1.42% | 21.20% | -12.29% | 14.04% |
SWSSX Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares | -2.49% | 12.88% | 11.57% | 17.07% | -20.43% | 14.77% | 20.12% | 25.63% | -11.19% | 14.76% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZSCCX achieves a -1.81% return, which is significantly higher than SWSSX's -2.49% return. Over the past 10 years, ZSCCX has outperformed SWSSX with an annualized return of 10.89%, while SWSSX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.50% annualized return.
ZSCCX
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- -5.90%
- YTD
- -1.81%
- 6M
- 0.70%
- 1Y
- 18.90%
- 3Y*
- 16.34%
- 5Y*
- 10.17%
- 10Y*
- 10.89%
SWSSX
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- -8.18%
- YTD
- -2.49%
- 6M
- -0.36%
- 1Y
- 21.55%
- 3Y*
- 11.83%
- 5Y*
- 3.10%
- 10Y*
- 9.50%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ZSCCX vs. SWSSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZSCCX has a 1.39% expense ratio, which is higher than SWSSX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ZSCCX vs. SWSSX — Risk / Return Rank
ZSCCX
SWSSX
ZSCCX vs. SWSSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zacks Small-Cap Core Fund (ZSCCX) and Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares (SWSSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZSCCX | SWSSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.85 | 0.91 | -0.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.32 | 1.40 | -0.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.18 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.33 | 1.33 | 0.00 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.72 | 5.02 | -0.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZSCCX | SWSSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 | 0.91 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.14 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | 0.40 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.33 | +0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between ZSCCX and SWSSX is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ZSCCX vs. SWSSX - Dividend Comparison
ZSCCX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SWSSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZSCCX Zacks Small-Cap Core Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 34.48% | 4.49% | 0.49% | 2.30% | 0.02% | 0.10% | 10.82% | 13.57% | 0.56% | 0.00% |
SWSSX Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares | 1.32% | 1.29% | 1.66% | 1.49% | 1.32% | 8.88% | 2.55% | 6.12% | 10.45% | 5.22% | 4.10% | 6.92% |
Drawdowns
ZSCCX vs. SWSSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZSCCX drawdown since its inception was -50.29%, smaller than the maximum SWSSX drawdown of -60.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZSCCX and SWSSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZSCCX | SWSSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.29% | -60.34% | +10.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.97% | -13.90% | +1.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.91% | -31.93% | +8.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.29% | -41.81% | -8.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.32% | -11.00% | +2.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.17% | -10.78% | +3.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.37% | 3.68% | -0.31% |
Volatility
ZSCCX vs. SWSSX - Volatility Comparison
Zacks Small-Cap Core Fund (ZSCCX) and Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares (SWSSX) have volatilities of 6.90% and 6.59%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ZSCCX | SWSSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.90% | 6.59% | +0.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.81% | 14.12% | -0.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.74% | 23.11% | -1.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.82% | 22.57% | +0.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.10% | 24.03% | +0.07% |