ZSCCX vs. CSMDX
Compare and contrast key facts about Zacks Small-Cap Core Fund (ZSCCX) and Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund (CSMDX).
ZSCCX is managed by Zacks. It was launched on Jun 30, 2011. CSMDX is managed by Copeland Funds. It was launched on Feb 27, 2017.
Performance
ZSCCX vs. CSMDX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ZSCCX vs. CSMDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZSCCX Zacks Small-Cap Core Fund | -1.81% | 10.25% | 27.77% | 17.94% | -11.84% | 32.60% | -1.42% | 21.20% | -12.29% | 11.15% |
CSMDX Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund | 1.51% | 2.72% | 2.24% | 18.89% | -14.89% | 22.60% | 8.29% | 29.90% | -5.20% | 10.44% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZSCCX achieves a -1.81% return, which is significantly lower than CSMDX's 1.51% return.
ZSCCX
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- -5.90%
- YTD
- -1.81%
- 6M
- 0.70%
- 1Y
- 18.90%
- 3Y*
- 16.34%
- 5Y*
- 10.17%
- 10Y*
- 10.89%
CSMDX
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- -8.78%
- YTD
- 1.51%
- 6M
- 1.88%
- 1Y
- 9.49%
- 3Y*
- 5.94%
- 5Y*
- 3.80%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ZSCCX vs. CSMDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZSCCX has a 1.39% expense ratio, which is higher than CSMDX's 0.95% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ZSCCX vs. CSMDX — Risk / Return Rank
ZSCCX
CSMDX
ZSCCX vs. CSMDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zacks Small-Cap Core Fund (ZSCCX) and Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund (CSMDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZSCCX | CSMDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.85 | 0.51 | +0.34 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.32 | 0.89 | +0.43 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.12 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.33 | 0.58 | +0.75 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.72 | 2.19 | +2.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZSCCX | CSMDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 | 0.51 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.21 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.40 | +0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between ZSCCX and CSMDX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ZSCCX vs. CSMDX - Dividend Comparison
ZSCCX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CSMDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.09%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZSCCX Zacks Small-Cap Core Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 34.48% | 4.49% | 0.49% | 2.30% | 0.02% | 0.10% | 10.82% | 13.57% | 0.56% |
CSMDX Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund | 3.09% | 3.14% | 1.33% | 0.81% | 4.07% | 6.67% | 0.38% | 2.61% | 4.40% | 0.13% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ZSCCX vs. CSMDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZSCCX drawdown since its inception was -50.29%, which is greater than CSMDX's maximum drawdown of -37.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZSCCX and CSMDX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZSCCX | CSMDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.29% | -37.28% | -13.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.97% | -13.33% | +1.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.91% | -24.60% | +0.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.32% | -9.20% | +0.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.17% | -5.84% | -1.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.37% | 3.52% | -0.15% |
Volatility
ZSCCX vs. CSMDX - Volatility Comparison
Zacks Small-Cap Core Fund (ZSCCX) has a higher volatility of 6.90% compared to Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund (CSMDX) at 4.58%. This indicates that ZSCCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSMDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ZSCCX | CSMDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.90% | 4.58% | +2.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.81% | 10.22% | +3.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.74% | 19.31% | +2.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.82% | 18.12% | +4.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.10% | 19.25% | +4.85% |