PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZSCCX vs. WEMMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZSCCX vs. WEMMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Zacks Small-Cap Core Fund (ZSCCX) and TETON Westwood Mighty Mites Fund (WEMMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZSCCX achieves a 18.54% return, which is significantly lower than WEMMX's 21.19% return. Over the past 10 years, ZSCCX has outperformed WEMMX with an annualized return of 12.69%, while WEMMX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.29% annualized return.


ZSCCX

1D
1.32%
1M
4.27%
YTD
18.54%
6M
18.72%
1Y
35.57%
3Y*
23.66%
5Y*
13.27%
10Y*
12.69%

WEMMX

1D
0.87%
1M
5.74%
YTD
21.19%
6M
22.91%
1Y
37.84%
3Y*
15.60%
5Y*
5.64%
10Y*
9.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZSCCX vs. WEMMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZSCCX
Zacks Small-Cap Core Fund
18.54%10.25%27.77%17.94%-11.84%32.60%-1.42%21.20%-12.29%14.04%
WEMMX
TETON Westwood Mighty Mites Fund
21.19%11.02%3.83%13.53%-15.37%21.44%10.02%16.94%-13.69%15.47%

Correlation

The correlation between ZSCCX and WEMMX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2011

0.93

The correlation between ZSCCX and WEMMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZSCCX vs. WEMMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZSCCX
ZSCCX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
ZSCCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZSCCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZSCCX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
ZSCCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZSCCX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

WEMMX
WEMMX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
WEMMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WEMMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
WEMMX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
WEMMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
WEMMX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZSCCX vs. WEMMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zacks Small-Cap Core Fund (ZSCCX) and TETON Westwood Mighty Mites Fund (WEMMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZSCCXWEMMXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.99

2.28

-0.29

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.85

3.25

-0.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.38

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.21

4.31

-0.10

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.89

13.24

-0.36

ZSCCX vs. WEMMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZSCCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is comparable to the WEMMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZSCCX and WEMMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZSCCXWEMMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.99

2.28

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.30

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

0.46

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.64

-0.10

Drawdowns

ZSCCX vs. WEMMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZSCCX drawdown since its inception was -50.29%, which is greater than WEMMX's maximum drawdown of -42.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZSCCX and WEMMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZSCCXWEMMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.29%

-42.48%

-7.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.85%

-9.31%

+0.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.87%

-21.44%

-0.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.91%

-27.11%

+3.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.29%

-41.73%

-8.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.11%

-6.62%

-0.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.89%

3.02%

-0.13%

Volatility

ZSCCX vs. WEMMX - Volatility Comparison

Zacks Small-Cap Core Fund (ZSCCX) and TETON Westwood Mighty Mites Fund (WEMMX) have volatilities of 5.35% and 5.22%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZSCCXWEMMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.35%

5.22%

+0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.53%

12.44%

+1.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.75%

17.64%

+1.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.83%

18.92%

+3.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.17%

20.45%

+3.72%

ZSCCX vs. WEMMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZSCCX has a 1.39% expense ratio, which is lower than WEMMX's 1.41% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZSCCX vs. WEMMX - Dividend Comparison

ZSCCX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WEMMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.82%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
WEMMX
TETON Westwood Mighty Mites Fund
18.82%22.80%26.79%18.86%13.60%15.44%9.23%4.11%4.16%6.44%4.61%2.35%
ZSCCX
Zacks Small-Cap Core Fund
0.00%0.00%34.48%4.49%0.49%2.30%0.02%0.10%10.82%13.57%0.56%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, ZSCCX and WEMMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ZSCCX has higher volatility (5.35%) compared to WEMMX (5.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZSCCX dropped -50.29% vs WEMMX's -42.48%.

WEMMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZSCCX and WEMMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer