SWSSX vs. SCHA
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares (SWSSX) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA).
SWSSX is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Index. It was launched on May 19, 1997. SCHA is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Total Return Index. It was launched on Nov 3, 2009. Both SWSSX and SCHA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SWSSX or SCHA.
Key characteristics
| SWSSX | SCHA | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 19.41% | 18.28% |
| 1Y Return | 42.37% | 40.93% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 1.23% | 2.20% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 10.09% | 10.82% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 8.91% | 9.69% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.96 | 2.06 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.82 | 2.90 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.34 | 1.36 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.51 | 1.64 |
| Martin Ratio | 11.31 | 12.20 |
| Ulcer Index | 3.75% | 3.36% |
| Daily Std Dev | 21.60% | 19.94% |
| Max Drawdown | -61.52% | -42.41% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.75% | -1.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between SWSSX and SCHA is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
SWSSX vs. SCHA - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, SWSSX achieves a 19.41% return, which is significantly higher than SCHA's 18.28% return. Over the past 10 years, SWSSX has underperformed SCHA with an annualized return of 8.91%, while SCHA has yielded a comparatively higher 9.69% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SWSSX vs. SCHA - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SWSSX and SCHA have an expense ratio of 0.04%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SWSSX vs. SCHA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares (SWSSX) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SWSSX vs. SCHA - Dividend Comparison
SWSSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, less than SCHA's 1.96% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWSSX Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares | 1.25% | 1.49% | 1.32% | 1.17% | 1.12% | 1.43% | 1.61% | 1.26% | 1.39% | 1.50% | 1.28% | 1.11% |
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | 1.96% | 2.85% | 2.37% | 2.17% | 1.39% | 2.11% | 2.84% | 2.01% | 2.18% | 2.16% | 1.78% | 1.42% |
Drawdowns
SWSSX vs. SCHA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWSSX drawdown since its inception was -61.52%, which is greater than SCHA's maximum drawdown of -42.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWSSX and SCHA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SWSSX vs. SCHA - Volatility Comparison
Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares (SWSSX) has a higher volatility of 7.42% compared to Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) at 6.64%. This indicates that SWSSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.